I just read a very entertaining thread where the question was posed ?????????????
At first glance there appeared to be no constructive sentence,no real question,no requested reply and very little in the way of information provided
After some very deep thinking,some respected members were digging away and making constructive suggestions as to the missing content
The thread was being prised open like a can of spaggetti and great progress was being made
The originator of the thread would have been under great pressure to respond and confirm or deny the suppositions being made
With this in mind and scenarios and difficult problems being solved,the thread was entertaining and was progressing in leaps and bounds
Then,the hammer of Thaw was wielded and for no good reason the thread was pulled
Now it may have seemed from a sober point of view,to have been meaningless and perhaps using up important capacity of the server but nevertheless,threads like these do have a place on a forum
There are on this forum, many repetative threads that are asking questions which also seem to be meaning less in their frequency and content
In these threads the perpetrator also gives little if any content,information and in instances make little or no sense
The question now asked,is why was the thread pulled ?
Is humour and frivolity not part and parcel of the forum content, or must all threads, as described, and the wider repative threads now have to contain a level of information and sense in order to qualify for continued inclusion
Dare I ask this question, or will the utter nerve and cheek of the act warrent exclusion on the grounds of having a sense of humour
At first glance there appeared to be no constructive sentence,no real question,no requested reply and very little in the way of information provided
After some very deep thinking,some respected members were digging away and making constructive suggestions as to the missing content
The thread was being prised open like a can of spaggetti and great progress was being made
The originator of the thread would have been under great pressure to respond and confirm or deny the suppositions being made
With this in mind and scenarios and difficult problems being solved,the thread was entertaining and was progressing in leaps and bounds
Then,the hammer of Thaw was wielded and for no good reason the thread was pulled
Now it may have seemed from a sober point of view,to have been meaningless and perhaps using up important capacity of the server but nevertheless,threads like these do have a place on a forum
There are on this forum, many repetative threads that are asking questions which also seem to be meaning less in their frequency and content
In these threads the perpetrator also gives little if any content,information and in instances make little or no sense
The question now asked,is why was the thread pulled ?
Is humour and frivolity not part and parcel of the forum content, or must all threads, as described, and the wider repative threads now have to contain a level of information and sense in order to qualify for continued inclusion
Dare I ask this question, or will the utter nerve and cheek of the act warrent exclusion on the grounds of having a sense of humour