THHN vs Romex behind drywall - why the difference | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss THHN vs Romex behind drywall - why the difference in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

timoct22

DIY
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Location
San Jose
THHN is supposed to be enclosed in conduit when behind drywall. Romex does not have the same requirement. Romex is "basically" THHN encased by a secondary sheath. Does this sheath really make that much difference such that THHN must be in conduit but Romex does not? Does that thin layer of plastic really make that big of adifference?
Context for the question: I am connecting a manual transfer switch to a subpanel. In order to minimize drywall work, I am mounting the transfer switch to the surface of the drywall. The subpanel is flush mounted (even with the surface) to the drywall. I am running the wires from the transfer switch through MC to a square junction box to provide a more 'finished' look. My plan was to run the wires through the back of the junction box the six inches to the subpanel inside the drywall without any conduit. If it were Romex, it would be allowed. THHN needs a conduit. Doesn't make sense to me.
 
THHN is what we call Singles , which has to be put in something like a conduit. There is one exception and that is some singles come with double insulation ( 2 layers ) which can be run outside of a conduit like from the electric meter to the fuse box.
 
Your situation, with a six-inch run of cable, is not a typical example of cable installation inside drywall. Normally, a length of 12-2 snaking around from outlet to outlet is exposed to extra mechanical damage, e.g. at staples, by carpenters' tools, by pulling through awkward holes etc. The sheath of NM offers a buffer that can afford to be worn down a little, without compromising the insulation itself. If the sheath becomes completely penetrated or ripped, any non-electrician can see that there is a problem and the cable needs replacing or repairing, even while the insulation remains safe.

In contrast, as soon as THHN is subjected to wear and tear, the insulation starts to be compromised. It is intended to withstand installation in properly executed, code-compliant conduit or raceway but no more. Leave it unenclosed at the mercy of the builders, and who gets to say when the amount of damage to the insulation is 'too much' to be safe?

It's not practical within an electrical code such as the NEC, to grant exemptions to every possible situation where the risk of damage is lower than normal, such as yours. Hence for every type of cable there has to be a simple and consistent set of rules about what conditions it can be installed in.

If you cut a hole in the sheetrock behind where the J-Box is going, can you not aim some FMC with a connector already attached, down into the hole in the panel?
 
In terms of USA regulations (the NEC "code") I would always defer to one of the American members of this forum such as @Megawatt

However, based on the basic idea of what you are doing, that of main supplies with a very high fault energy present, I would always prefer the cables to be in conduit, trunking, or other metal (i.e. non inflammable and hard to accidentally penetrate) containment.
 
THHN is supposed to be enclosed in conduit when behind drywall. Romex does not have the same requirement. Romex is "basically" THHN encased by a secondary sheath. Does this sheath really make that much difference such that THHN must be in conduit but Romex does not? Does that thin layer of plastic really make that big of adifference?
Context for the question: I am connecting a manual transfer switch to a subpanel. In order to minimize drywall work, I am mounting the transfer switch to the surface of the drywall. The subpanel is flush mounted (even with the surface) to the drywall. I am running the wires from the transfer switch through MC to a square junction box to provide a more 'finished' look. My plan was to run the wires through the back of the junction box the six inches to the subpanel inside the drywall without any conduit. If it were Romex, it would be allowed. THHN needs a conduit. Doesn't make sense to me.
You need to check the code book, all THHN or any single strand wires must be installed in a raceway.
 

Reply to THHN vs Romex behind drywall - why the difference in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
Yes it is nothing like liquidtite flex and it has no metal and is very flexible. You can purchase it at any Home Depot or Lowes. Good luck my friend
Replies
3
Views
2K
DIYer here. I'd like to install an electric car wall charger myself. It calls for 6/2 romex which I have. Unfortunately my panel is in my...
Replies
0
Views
915
  • Question
I’m running a feeder from main panel into spa panel that I’ll mount on exterior wall of house , will run through basement ceiling. Im thinking to...
Replies
0
Views
765
  • Question
Obviously not a building/DIY forum so will keep it short but yes - we've taken all the floors up. Several joists in the bathroom need doing as...
Replies
8
Views
1K
Before I pay an electrician to come check my work, I thought it worth a post here. I don't want to pay the cost of a small car for a whole-house...
Replies
0
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks