Through Crimping question?

[northernsparky]

A guy on the job im on at the minute (O.A.P court/block of flats) has through crimped the 25mm tails from the meter to the DB twice (20m run). To me the fact that tails are double insulated in the first place to the current rating of the cable but has twice been taking down to a bare metal crimp with just a few wraps of insulation tape seems dodgy as hell especially when we all know insulation tape tends to go soft and "claggy" over time.

My question is, is this acceptable considering thermal cycling etc and the general practice of this method and also would you end up having to put a cross in the box regarding 'double insulated'?

 

[telectrix]

not acceptable . diabolical workmanship. would you have that in your house?

 

[edrobbo8]

Awful, heat shrink is normally better on crimped connections but not on tails!

 

[northernsparky]

thought so, tried to point this out to the guy but he was having non of it. Just wanted to double-check i had my facts right before i had another go and make him rip it all out again.

thanks guys, much appreciated!

 

[mogga]

2 joints in 20mtrs WTF even heat shrinkin wouldnt help

 

[i=p/u]

did you ever use a rubber tape for insulting crimped connections back in the day telectrix

 

[mogga]

you mean self amalgumating tape I=P/U

 

[i=p/u]

aye , i found about ten rolls today, does people still use it mogga

 

[telectrix]

IMO , if a joint in tails is unavoidable, then henley blocks, suitably fixed to the fabric of the building is the only way. but not 2 joins in each cable. that's pants. did he get the cable off the local pikeys?

 

[northernsparky]

His excuse was that there wasnt enough time on the job to pull in new tails even though its all ran in trunking through the communal corridors etc. It's beyond bad practice to me.

 

[telectrix]

so, what's his next move? no time to terminate cpc's, let's cut 'em off.

 

[robsparky1975]

I didnt think it was acceptable to run meter tails more than 3 mtrs be they in trunking or not,why didnt this bloke use swa and a suitable switch fuse,he sounds like an accident waiting to happen,no wonder there is a big magnifying glass looking upon the industry with people like him about,im sure i speak for all,the job gets done properly first time,with the correct materials,that guy is NO competent electrician.

 

[gap30]

I didnt think it was acceptable to run meter tails more than 3 mtrs be they in trunking or not,why didnt this bloke use swa and a suitable switch fuse,he sounds like an accident waiting to happen,no wonder there is a big magnifying glass looking upon the industry with people like him about,im sure i speak for all,the job gets done properly first time,with the correct materials,that guy is NO competent electrician.

yes thats what i have always been led to believe

btw i have used 25mm through crimps several times in scotch joints, adaptable boxes for damaged swa etc plus John Gibbons who used to be the main NIC guy back in the day told me they do not need to be inspected as they are classed as a mechanical connection

 

[1shortcircuit]

I didnt think it was acceptable to run meter tails more than 3 mtrs

I was under the impression that the DNO limits you to 3 metres, any distance above this has to be at their discretion?

 

[Adam W]

His excuse was that there wasnt enough time on the job to pull in new tails even though its all ran in trunking through the communal corridors etc. It's beyond bad practice to me.

IMO that's not a good enough excuse - it's up there with "the customer didn't want me to make a mess" and "it had to be done to budget". Fair enough the crimps are in trunking but wrapping a bit of tape around them means they're not even single insulated properly... Twice.