P
peck06
Right, here comes the story...
Me mum had an extension on her house few years ago, which I completed all the electrics for when i was an apprentice, many moons ago and pre 17th edition. As I was living there at the time and as you do I never actually completed the install.
The extension was a down stairs shower room and utility area. When I done it I put in a new lighting circuit, new ring circuit and shower circuit, all wired to the mains in the garage. Existing was a 10 way crabtee split load, with all the existing wiring. Next to it was a proteus 4 way board which only had one lighting circuit attached to it.
About 6 years ago I just connected all the new circuits onto the proteus board.
Well today 6 years after I started I finally decided to change the board and get everything on an RCD, using a split load board I purchased 6 years ago.
Obviously it was pre 17th edition so was main switch type with 30mA RCD on the other side. I've connected all the ciruits from the proteus board onto the RCD side of the split load, inc shower lighting circuit, sockets and shower, but I haven't touched the other board that has the rest of the house wiring in it.
So everything on that board complies to 17th Edition. I do mainly commercial works and not much domestic, but next month I'm wanting to do my Napit assesement and was going to use this as an example. I have done the bond to the main gas (which was at the opposite end of the house) but not yet the main water as its abit more akward.
I guess what I'm asking is will the assessor accept just looking at the board i've done today or will I have to test the existing installation and move the existing upstairs lighting circuit onto the RCD side, because there is a bathroom upstairs??
I assume he will want to see that I have actually bonded the main water, since its taken me 6 years to complete the extension.
Also will he want to see the LABC notification as I don't think it was ever actually signed off since the builder left the site before it was fully completed?
Any other advice with regards to a Napit assesement are more than welcome.
Thanks (apologies for the lengthy post)
Me mum had an extension on her house few years ago, which I completed all the electrics for when i was an apprentice, many moons ago and pre 17th edition. As I was living there at the time and as you do I never actually completed the install.
The extension was a down stairs shower room and utility area. When I done it I put in a new lighting circuit, new ring circuit and shower circuit, all wired to the mains in the garage. Existing was a 10 way crabtee split load, with all the existing wiring. Next to it was a proteus 4 way board which only had one lighting circuit attached to it.
About 6 years ago I just connected all the new circuits onto the proteus board.
Well today 6 years after I started I finally decided to change the board and get everything on an RCD, using a split load board I purchased 6 years ago.
Obviously it was pre 17th edition so was main switch type with 30mA RCD on the other side. I've connected all the ciruits from the proteus board onto the RCD side of the split load, inc shower lighting circuit, sockets and shower, but I haven't touched the other board that has the rest of the house wiring in it.
So everything on that board complies to 17th Edition. I do mainly commercial works and not much domestic, but next month I'm wanting to do my Napit assesement and was going to use this as an example. I have done the bond to the main gas (which was at the opposite end of the house) but not yet the main water as its abit more akward.
I guess what I'm asking is will the assessor accept just looking at the board i've done today or will I have to test the existing installation and move the existing upstairs lighting circuit onto the RCD side, because there is a bathroom upstairs??
I assume he will want to see that I have actually bonded the main water, since its taken me 6 years to complete the extension.
Also will he want to see the LABC notification as I don't think it was ever actually signed off since the builder left the site before it was fully completed?
Any other advice with regards to a Napit assesement are more than welcome.
Thanks (apologies for the lengthy post)
Last edited by a moderator: