Has there been any progress on the Part P review

[Dunx]

Wondered whether anything had come of this, like abolishing it.....?!

 

[Octopus]

Can't see that happening, the "turkeys" at Elecsa, Napit and NICEIC aren't going to vote form Xmas are they!

 

[Des 56]

Is not the level 3 requirement for the start of 2012 suspended ?



Wales can now go its own way,so the race with England can now begin to see who gets rid of the nonsense the quickest

 

[Specialist]

Abolish Part P, we live in hope mate:lol: But seriously, i'd be very surprised if that ever happens. There are too many people lining their pockets throught it.

 

[trev]

It will not matter how many working groups they put on it or how many enquirys or reviews they do, nothing will change for the better.

 

[oldtimer]

Whats Part P ? ( fae a Scottish sparky)

 

[Dunx]

Ah well, hope springs eternal!

 

[Deleted member 26818]

As I understand it, all the scheme providers are stating that the majority of their members want Part P to stay.

 

[JD6400]

As I understand it, all the scheme providers are stating that the majority of their members want Part P to stay.

Not wanting to sound cynical but could it just be all the new Electrical Trainee wonders they are talking about , cause it makes them look official when they have a sticker , hold on thinking about it that could be the majority now !

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Or it could be that they are lying through their teeth?

 

[darkforces]

Or it could be that they are lying through their teeth?

Check your PM's please

 

[highspark]

As I understand it, all the scheme providers are stating that the majority of their members want Part P to stay.

I for one agree that PART P should stay but it needs to be harder to get in. I think the NVQ3 plus the 17th and 2391 should be a minimum for a QS.

 

[oldtimer]

Guys I hear this Part P should stay and as a Scottish sparky (we dont have it up here and according to Select it will never happen) I am not trying to put anyone down here but our trade is a Bl**£4 mess when it comes to organisation but I do feel our trade there should be a min of 4 years training for youngsters and a min 2 years with 1 year improving for what I would call mature students. This comes from a guy who served 4 years to get electricians level then another 2 years to get approved and even after all that time I would not say that I was the finished article. The thing that worries me is that qualifications appear to be getting chucked about like confetti

 

[jase]

I for one agree that PART P should stay but it needs to be harder to get in. I think the NVQ3 plus the 17th and 2391 should be a minimum for a QS.

more bloody qualifications!!!! arggghhhhhh , thought the point of part p was to show your competence and understanding of the regs, anyone can go and sit in a clasroom for 10 yrs and do as much maths as as they want, DOESNT MAKE THEM COMPETENT!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[JD6400]

I for one agree that PART P should stay but it needs to be harder to get in. I think the NVQ3 plus the 17th and 2391 should be a minimum for a QS.

NVQ ? Whats that in proper money then ?

Sorry I know i shouldn't but i could not resit it ! :leaving: