Wylex 45A MCB or Compatible | on ElectriciansForums
Click here to remove these ads

Wylex 45A MCB or Compatible

Discuss Wylex 45A MCB or Compatible in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

L

LeighSawczyn

Hi Peeps,
Doing an EICR where a shower cable is 6mm[SUP]2 [/SUP]from the CU to the pull switch then 10mm[SUP]2[/SUP] to the shower. Assuming the 6mm cable is rated at 47A then the Wylex 50A MCB fails In<Iz.
It's a 9.5kW Shower so is pulling 41A therefore a 45A MCB would be perfect to meet the demand whilst being rated less than the cable. The only problem is Wylex don't make a 45A MCB so who else makes one that will fit?
I'm not totally happy with putting in a 40A one as overheating alarm bells are ringing in my head. I don't fancy rewiring 10mm between the CU and the switch either.
Thanks in advance. Oh and ignore the Trainee status I don't know how to change it.
 
For a fixed load which is not subject to overload faults you don't need to provide overload protection to the supply cable, only fault protection.
So an electric shower on a 6mm connected to a 50A MCB is almost certainly compliant with the regulations.
 
I'd go with Murdoch on this one and fit a 40A MCB. I know you've said 'assume' 47A for the CCC (ref method C) so I'm guessing it could be any ref method which would lower the CCC.

Also you could clamp meter the shower then you could see how much current is actually flowing, this would give you some peace of mind that the shower wont be tripping.

I'm not sure what you meant by 'I'm not totally happy with putting in a 40A one as overheating alarm bells are ringing in my head'? If you put in a 40A MCB this will decrease the chance of the cable overheating compared to a 45 or 50A MCB.
 
happyhippydad said:
If you put in a 40A MCB this will decrease the chance of the cable overheating compared to a 45 or 50A MCB.
Click to expand...

How will the 40A reduce the chance of the cable overheating? The shower won't draw any less current as a result of changing the mcb, and the fact that it is not subject to overload faults doesn't change.
 
happyhippydad said:
I'd go with Murdoch on this one and fit a 40A MCB. I know you've said 'assume' 47A for the CCC (ref method C) so I'm guessing it could be any ref method which would lower the CCC.

Also you could clamp meter the shower then you could see how much current is actually flowing, this would give you some peace of mind that the shower wont be tripping.

I'm not sure what you meant by 'I'm not totally happy with putting in a 40A one as overheating alarm bells are ringing in my head'? If you put in a 40A MCB this will decrease the chance of the cable overheating compared to a 45 or 50A MCB.
Click to expand...

He could mean the MCB getting hot possibly. But realistically the shower is not going to be pulling the current for long when used anyway.
 
I was referring to the MCB getting hot happyhippydad. If more current flows through than it is designed for then it's bound to produce quite a bit of heat before it trips.
And I have to disagree with davesparks a 6mm cable ref C is good for 47A so if there was a fault in it then what's gonna blow first the MCB or the cable? This is more about the cable than the shower. What's the.use of In<Iz if you can use a 50A overcurrent protective device for a 47A cable? I see Figure 3A4 on page 301 shows that a 40A MCB won't actually trip at 41A anyhow more like 58A and then that's after about 4000 seconds or 67 minutes
 
LeighSawczyn said:
I was referring to the MCB getting hot happyhippydad. If more current flows through than it is designed for then it's bound to produce quite a bit of heat before it trips.
And I have to disagree with davesparks a 6mm cable ref C is good for 47A so if there was a fault in it then what's gonna blow first the MCB or the cable? This is more about the cable than the shower. What's the.use of In<Iz if you can use a 50A overcurrent protective device for a 47A cable? I see Figure 3A4 on page 301 shows that a 40A MCB won't actually trip at 41A anyhow more like 58A and then that's after about 4000 seconds or 67 minutes
Click to expand...

Check BS7671 for omission of devices for protection against overload . 433.3

EDIT...
 
Last edited:
LeighSawczyn said:
I was referring to the MCB getting hot happyhippydad. If more current flows through than it is designed for then it's bound to produce quite a bit of heat before it trips.
And I have to disagree with davesparks a 6mm cable ref C is good for 47A so if there was a fault in it then what's gonna blow first the MCB or the cable? This is more about the cable than the shower. What's the.use of In<Iz if you can use a 50A overcurrent protective device for a 47A cable? I see Figure 3A4 on page 301 shows that a 40A MCB won't actually trip at 41A anyhow more like 58A and then that's after about 4000 seconds or 67 minutes
Click to expand...

If more current flows through an mcb than it is designed for then it will operate and disconnect the circuit, that's the whole point!

And you have missed the point on your second point.
You are confusing overload protection with fault protection. Overload protection is not required for fixed equipment which cannot by its nature overload. An electric shower is a heating element in a tin can, heating elements either fail open circuit or short circuit/short to earth they don't overload .

In<Iz does not apply to items which are not subject to overload, in this case you use Ib<Iz.
 
LeighSawczyn said:
I was referring to the MCB getting hot happyhippydad. If more current flows through than it is designed for then it's bound to produce quite a bit of heat before it trips.
And I have to disagree with davesparks a 6mm cable ref C is good for 47A so if there was a fault in it then what's gonna blow first the MCB or the cable? This is more about the cable than the shower. What's the.use of In<Iz if you can use a 50A overcurrent protective device for a 47A cable? I see Figure 3A4 on page 301 shows that a 40A MCB won't actually trip at 41A anyhow more like 58A and then that's after about 4000 seconds or 67 minutes
Click to expand...


Sorry Leigh, misunderstood!

I'm afraid I dont know enough about the actual make up of an MCB to know if that will 'overheat' it, I wouldn't have thought so, but I dont know. If they are rated at 6000A though???

davesparks said:
If more current flows through an mcb than it is designed for then it will operate and disconnect the circuit, that's the whole point!

And you have missed the point on your second point.
You are confusing overload protection with fault protection. Overload protection is not required for fixed equipment which cannot by its nature overload. An electric shower is a heating element in a tin can, heating elements either fail open circuit or short circuit/short to earth they don't overload .

In<Iz does not apply to items which are not subject to overload, in this case you use Ib<Iz.
Click to expand...

I know that 433.3.1 (ii) can apply Dave but ever since I got these results I get a bit jumpy:

[ElectriciansForums.net] Wylex 45A MCB or Compatible [ElectriciansForums.net] Wylex 45A MCB or Compatible

Also.. we're not sure about the reference method?
 
the whole point of 433.1 is that the 50A MCB is there to protect against fault current up to 6000A in the case of a short circuit. a socket circuit can be overladed just by plugging too much load in, but a shower is fixed. as said before it can only go open/short/ or fail to E.

open means it won't heat. short means a fault current which will trip any MCB. fail to E is handled by the RCD. QED.
 
My apologies about the example above with the 800W microwave with a current of 5.95A. I see now that a microwave has 2 ratings

The cooker power rating (which is 800W)
and the operating power requirement or rating input (which shows 1200W on the back of the microwave),

so 5.95A is 'about' right.. I will now trust 433.3.1 !
 

Reply to Wylex 45A MCB or Compatible in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

M
  • Question
Can I simply change this over.
Ok, thanks Dave.
Replies
2
Views
980
Mcwill
M
K
  • Question
Which Type 2 SPD (preferably without the need for separate MCB) will Fit inti ClipSal CU
There are some useful and free documents on CU replacement (Best Practice Guide #1) and EICR (Best Practice Guide #4) here...
Replies
16
Views
5K
pc1966
P
HappyHippyDad
What code for this?
@HappyHippyDad , have a read of this similar thread I posted a while back, there is some input from the manufacturers there too which is...
Replies
8
Views
3K
Pretty Mouth
Pretty Mouth
E
  • Question
8.5kw shower install
Did you go back today ECES? If so what was the outcome? Just interested
Replies
15
Views
2K
HappyHippyDad
HappyHippyDad
Bubbler Bob
Upgrading Older Style Wylex Type B MCB's to BS EN 60898
Roly, duly noted! thanks
Replies
12
Views
7K
Bubbler Bob
Bubbler Bob

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

Tilers Community
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
NHS Forums | Forum for NHS Staff and NHS Patients
Back
Top
✖
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks