I am planning on redoing my basement floors and debating on adding underfloor radiant heat. It would be supplemental to my HVAC as the basement as being 70 year old house all registers are roof mount.
My question is due to the large area of main room roughly 13' Ă— 30' (4m Ă— 10m) 400 square feet or 40 square meters. This leads to my current problem, most single cables are less than 100m (300') or harder to find, (I've only found a single 1000' cable which is what I'd need to do the entire room). What seems to be an easier solution would be to run 10 parallel runs of heating cable. Using 33ohm/m cable that would roughly be 10 Ă— 110Watt circuits. Which of these would be the better option. The single cables systems seem to all run around 3000-4000 Watts.
Is there any disadvantage to running the parallel circuits rather than the single cable system?
My question is due to the large area of main room roughly 13' Ă— 30' (4m Ă— 10m) 400 square feet or 40 square meters. This leads to my current problem, most single cables are less than 100m (300') or harder to find, (I've only found a single 1000' cable which is what I'd need to do the entire room). What seems to be an easier solution would be to run 10 parallel runs of heating cable. Using 33ohm/m cable that would roughly be 10 Ă— 110Watt circuits. Which of these would be the better option. The single cables systems seem to all run around 3000-4000 Watts.
Is there any disadvantage to running the parallel circuits rather than the single cable system?
- TL;DR
- The more common in floor heating systems are single cables per room. These run about 3600Watts, another option would be run 10 Ă— 16m runs in parallel with 33ohm/m heating cable. This should be 10 Ă— 110Watt or 1100Watts. Is there any disadvantage to running the parallel system?