High earth loop impedance | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss High earth loop impedance in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Nickj

-
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
138
Reaction score
79
Location
South Wales
Hello all,

I am studying to be an electrician but outside of the classroom I have little experience.

A friend has bought a house and during the buying process had an eicr with unsatisfactory result.

Reading the report it shows the ring and shower circuit to have high earth loop impedance.

I ran the test myself today and the earth loop impedance on the ring and radial are around 40 ohms, which is what the eicr also shows.

I have checked the wiring of all the sockets and all seem to be terminated correctly.

r1, rn and r2 for the ring all seem fine.

According to the report the Ze is also fine.


What could be causing this?

I suspect a problem with one of the other circuits, would I be going down the right alley with that assumption?

Thanks,

Nick
 
It's a tn-s, Ze on the eicr is 0.3.

R1 0.14, rn 0.14 r2 0.22. I ran out of time and didn't take r1 + r2 of the ring (it's not on eicr) I did no testing on radial, shower or other circuits.

From the eicr

shower earth loop impedance 42.3
ring 43 (confirmed with my meter today)
radial 42
 
It's a tn-s, Ze on the eicr is 0.3.

R1 0.14, rn 0.14 r2 0.22. I ran out of time and didn't take r1 + r2 of the ring (it's not on eicr) I did no testing on radial, shower or other circuits.

From the eicr

shower earth loop impedance 42.3
ring 43 (confirmed with my meter today)
radial 42

Are these circuits on the same RCD and if so are there other circuits on this RCD?
 
Are these circuits on the same RCD and if so are there other circuits on this RCD?
see where you're thinking. had similar where the excessive reading was caused by internal "resistance" of a RCD. one way to confirm would be to take readingss by this method on hi current test.

[ElectriciansForums.net] High earth loop impedance

diagram by courtesy of richard burns.
 
not necessarily. in the event of a fault, due to the higher current generated, the RCD impedance would probably be negated. also, there's the get-out 1667 value where a RCD is installed on the circuit/s.
 
Thank you.

So if by calculation I get an acceptable Zs (and also an acceptable one using the method described above) and the rcd trip times are < 40ms (which they are on the eicr) it would be acceptable to leave the rcd and installation as is (being safe)? putting those values of 40+ down as a quirk of rcd design

nick
 
Hi Andy,

i did did not measure those, the eicr has the cooker at 0.43 and the central heating at 1.44.

the eicr has the radial at 0.83, however I recorded the radial at 42 so unsure if the electrician doing the eicr did the radial, central heating and cooker by calc.
 
Hi Andy,

i did did not measure those, the eicr has the cooker at 0.43 and the central heating at 1.44.

the eicr has the radial at 0.83, however I recorded the radial at 42 so unsure if the electrician doing the eicr did the radial, central heating and cooker by calc.
I would check the Zs values of the other circuits on the same RCD to confirm the thinking.
 
Hi Andy,

i did did not measure those, the eicr has the cooker at 0.43 and the central heating at 1.44.

the eicr has the radial at 0.83, however I recorded the radial at 42 so unsure if the electrician doing the eicr did all but the radial, central heating and cooker by calc.

Those could be worth investigating to see if the high loop readings are consistent across all the circuits that are protected by the RCD. If not then a point of high resistance common to the first three circuits would seem logical. It's not unknown for breakers to be installed incorrectly on the busbar, or for multiple sections of busbar, or even cable links, be used to make up connections between breakers for instance.
 
Just a quick update to thank you all for your help.

I solved the problem today and it was caused by a very high Ze. The electrician that wrote the eicr stated he measured a Ze of 0.3. This was clearly made up because when I checked the cable was tarnished and the resistance of the cable alone was > 2 ohms! (I forget the actual reading).

I used some wire wool to clear the tarnish and re-ran the earth loop impedance on all circuits. All well within allowed values now.

Thanks again

Nick
 

Reply to High earth loop impedance in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
It's the same with any system, if you put poo in, you get poo out!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Question
Good point James. It would have been nice if the manual had mentioned which of the leads were being used for what though. It simply shows the LNE...
Replies
7
Views
520
Hi David. I'm currently doing this same design project from home. Can I ask you a question? When working out the design current for the circuits...
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Question
Just an update for anyone interested, I got another rod in outside today, which has lowered the Zs db to a more healthy 53ohms. The oven elements...
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Question
Still, if integrity matters you really want two CPC attachment points. In some cases the 2nd CPC might be conduit, etc, so connected separately...
Replies
9
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks