RCD Requirements minor works | on ElectriciansForums
Click here to remove these ads

RCD Requirements minor works

Discuss RCD Requirements minor works in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

S

Stspark

-
Joined
Apr 22, 2017
Messages
78
Reaction score
65
Location
Uk
Interested in fellow sparks opinions on this.

Client of a 15-20year old commercial/Industrial premises wants an additional 13a socket outlet installed for a specific piece of equipment, the additional wiring for this will be off a current non-rcd ring (with satisfactory Zs value) and installed not buried less than 50mm in walls.
The ring main currently supplies about 15 socket outlets for general purpose and electronic equipment. The earth leakage on the circuit is likely too high for an rcbo to be installed at db without nuisance tripping. The db has no spare ways to split the circuit into smaller radials or with a bit of rewiring smaller rings.

Bearing in mind there is no rcd protection for the entire circuit, will labelling of the additional socket outlet for a specific item of equipment suffice?

I've usually always found a way to improve the whole circuit and install rcbo at source for minor works however I don't think its reasonable in this situation.
 
Labelling a socket to me is a pointless exercise and what would you deem this specific item of equipment to be. A risk assessment is required with acceptance from your client that additional rcd protection will not be provided. You could fit an rcd socket but I see this as pointless seeing as none of the rest are rcd protected.
 
The regulations give 2 options for omitting rcd protection to a socket outlet
Not sure option b requires a risk assessment

(a) where, other than for an installation in a dwelling, a documented risk assessment determines that the RCD protection is not necessary, or

(b) for a specific labelled or otherwise suitably identified socket-outlet provided for connection of a particular item of equipment.


The exception in indent (b), relating to the omission of RCD protection for specific socket-outlets, is included in both the current and new versions of the regulation.

It is stressed that the exception may only be applied for a socket-outlet that has been provided for the connection of a particular item of equipment. The socket-outlet must be labelled or otherwise suitably identified so that users will be clearly informed that the socket-outlet is intended only for plugging in that particular item of equipment and for no other purpose. Unless the electrical installation designer is convinced that the socket-outlet cannot reasonably be expected to be used for other purposes, RCD protection for that socket-outlet should not be omitted.

Both options look like they are being dumped in the new 18th edition so if your gonna do it,
Do it while you can
 
I'm sure there's been similar too..

Yep, with 18th round the corner this type of situation could end up being a costly additional socket.
 
Commercial is not so much a risk as domestic as it is not the socket which creates harm but the appliance using said socket. Commercial duty holders are required by law to ensure appliances are safe and fit for purpose which should limit hazards.
 
To start with, unless the installation is agricultural/horticultural or the circuit passes through a zone or supplies equipment in a special location there is no requirement to provide RCD protection for socket circuits.
Either install an RCD socket, or label the socket.
 
Additional protection provided to all socket outlets upto 20 amps and mobile equipment upto 32 amps for equipment outdoors is the actual requirement.
With 2 exceptions already listed
 
Back to the thread ..I the socket was behind the item of equipment and not readily accessible label it. If there is a likelihood that it could get used then fit a rcd socket as said risk assessment.
 

Reply to RCD Requirements minor works in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

M-B-Electrical-Services
RCD protection for a temporary 16A commando socket outlet
Stick the socket in a large plastic wall box with hinge and padlock. Give customer letter with key...
Replies
17
Views
3K
UKMeterman
UKMeterman
J
RCD trips
In my opinion replacing the consumer unit and waiting to see which RCBO trips is not a good fault finding technique. If the lighting circuit...
Replies
8
Views
447
davesparks
D
cliffed
  • Question
RCD Tripping intermittently
Yea all out circuits were disconnected & Rcd ramped tested Think this will be the right way forward,with EL clamp meter Cheers have a nice Christmas 😎
Replies
2
Views
1K
cliffed
cliffed
timhoward
32 amp 3 phase socket, 300ma RCD
As per above from Dave. Swap to a 63A outlet and problem goes away. What gets plugged into it is not part of an inspection.
Replies
20
Views
2K
Rockingit
Rockingit
I
  • Question
TT Install with Solar - RCD question
Good point, I was assuming an up-front RCD is for fault protection within DB, etc, and to cover for a failed RCBO for fault conditions, not as...
Replies
6
Views
2K
pc1966
P

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

Tilers Community
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
NHS Forums | Forum for NHS Staff and NHS Patients
Back
Top
✖
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks