EICR and subsequent remedial work | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss EICR and subsequent remedial work in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

leep82

-
Arms
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
424
Reaction score
130
Location
Stoke on Trent
Ive got an EICR to do this week, and ive mentioned previously how this is somthing i wish to do more off and i feel hands on experience is the best way to learn.

The property has only 4 circuits. 1 x ring, 1 x lighting, 1 x heating and 1 x cooker. I was originally asked to go and have a quick look by the customer as they had recently moved into the house and they were a little concerned by a few things.

A full kitchen refurb is planned in the next few weeks and with this in mind aswell as the issues raised by the customer i suggested the best course of action would be to carry out an EICR. This was agreed and i was also asked if i would be able to carry out the proposed kitchen refurb.

Now when i went to visit the property a couple of things caught my eye that i know will deem the installation unsatisfactory in terms of the report. One being the 45a cooker switch supplied in 6mm2 T&E and protected by a 32a MCB, which isolates the cooker, microwave and dishwasher all supplied in 2.5mm2 T&E from the cooker switch. When the refurb goes ahead this will all be corrected but my observations will be made on the installation at the time of the inspection. And so an unsatisfactory report given.

The plan is to use the existing 6mm feed to supply the induction hob ( which currently sits disconnected in the work top ). When i test the circuit can i use the results from the unsatisfactory report to issue a new satisfactory report once any remedial work is done. Or do i need to retest? This also goes for any other issues i may find.

A minor works certificate will be issued for the kitchen refurb once completed, and im left wondering if im creating myself extra needless paper work. If the issue ive mentioned turns out to be the only thing preventing a satisfactory report would it be better to just isolate/remove from circuit, as i know i am going in to do the refurb work anyway?

Thanks
 
An EICR is a report on a property, if done now you suggest would be unsatisfactory.

A MWC should be issued for each and EVERY circuit you alter

An EIC should be issued for each new circuit/change of fuseboard

A Part P notification (in England) should be issued for each new circuit and fuseboard change

If the customer then asks for a "satisfactory" report - you need to re do it

That's the situation in a nutshell.

Such documentation is made FAR EASIER with certificates software

PS: If the 2.5mm cable is less than 2m long you can not justify a C2
 
I don't do EICR's. I've often wondered the merits of doing one on small domestic properties. Why not use money being spent on such an EICR, just to rectify the obvious?
The problem being that there may be more than just the obvious. The customer plans on doing quite a lot to the property and wants peace of mind that the electrical installation is of a satisfactory nature.
 
The problem being that there may be more than just the obvious. The customer plans on doing quite a lot to the property and wants peace of mind that the electrical installation is of a satisfactory nature.

Just saying there's not a lot to inspect, any 'issues' would be found when altering or adding to. If the kitchens being refurbed, that's 3 out of 4 circuits your gonna be testing anyway.
 
This is one of the legs fed via the 45a cooker switch to supply the washing machine. It is more than likely less than 2 meters in length but i think the state of the socket still warrants a C2 doesnt it?
[ElectriciansForums.net] EICR and subsequent remedial work
 
Ive got an EICR to do this week, and ive mentioned previously how this is somthing i wish to do more off and i feel hands on experience is the best way to learn.

The property has only 4 circuits. 1 x ring, 1 x lighting, 1 x heating and 1 x cooker. I was originally asked to go and have a quick look by the customer as they had recently moved into the house and they were a little concerned by a few things.

A full kitchen refurb is planned in the next few weeks and with this in mind aswell as the issues raised by the customer i suggested the best course of action would be to carry out an EICR. This was agreed and i was also asked if i would be able to carry out the proposed kitchen refurb.

Now when i went to visit the property a couple of things caught my eye that i know will deem the installation unsatisfactory in terms of the report. One being the 45a cooker switch supplied in 6mm2 T&E and protected by a 32a MCB, which isolates the cooker, microwave and dishwasher all supplied in 2.5mm2 T&E from the cooker switch. When the refurb goes ahead this will all be corrected but my observations will be made on the installation at the time of the inspection. And so an unsatisfactory report given.

The plan is to use the existing 6mm feed to supply the induction hob ( which currently sits disconnected in the work top ). When i test the circuit can i use the results from the unsatisfactory report to issue a new satisfactory report once any remedial work is done. Or do i need to retest? This also goes for any other issues i may find.

A minor works certificate will be issued for the kitchen refurb once completed, and im left wondering if im creating myself extra needless paper work. If the issue ive mentioned turns out to be the only thing preventing a satisfactory report would it be better to just isolate/remove from circuit, as i know i am going in to do the refurb work anyway?

Thanks
What will you issue a MNEWscertificate for? Will you be adding any new circuits?
 
OK ta, how do you intend feeding the circuits that are taken from the existing 6mm2 cooker supply?
The kitchen is getting ripped apart and taken back to brick on some walls. My intention was to break into the existing ring final circuit to supply appliances. The 6mm2 cooker feed will then be used to supply the induction hob although the position of the switch itself needs moving
 
I'd be tempted to persuaded client to have new circuits for the kitchen refurb, if the installation allows. New CU?
Absolutely agree but there are no more spare ways in the consumer unit, where an RCD is acting as the main switch. Its far from ideal but does it actually warrant any form of code as far as the EICR is concerned? I dont want to scare the customer off recommending this that and the other at a great expense. Part of the reason i suggested the EICR. At least then the customer hopefully has more of an understanding of their installation.
 

Reply to EICR and subsequent remedial work in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
386
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
966
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Here the BPG#4 is useful, it is not a statutory document at all, but it provides good guidance as to what can reasonably considered as C1/C2/C3...
Replies
11
Views
1K
Thanks for the reply littlespark. Yes the works have been carried out. Surely it is fraudulent because basically the document is Not...
Replies
2
Views
720

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top