Schedule of results when adding to installation

n180 · Nov 24, 2018

When adding just a couple of circuits to an existing installation, what exactly do you put on the schedule of results with regards to the old circuits.

Just the circuit number and name or do you add the breaker details also like bsen, type, breaking capacity, rating. Obviously can't add ref method as you didn't do install so don't know all the details, but what about conductor sizes you can see inside CU?

Thanks.

Strima · Nov 24, 2018

I add as much information as possible and any test results that I have attained. Not Verified (NV) is also used a lot.

westward10 · Nov 24, 2018

Have you added to existing circuits or are your circuits completely new.

Deleted member 26818 · Nov 24, 2018

Put as much or as little as you want.
Whatever you do put in should be verified.

Pete999 · Nov 24, 2018

westward10 said:
Have you added to existing circuits or are your circuits completely new.

What is it with all these Gorilla Avatars? first SC and now W10 when you become Mods is it a prerequisite, to turn into a Primate?

westward10 · Nov 24, 2018

Pete999 said:
What is it with all these Gorilla Avatars? first SC and now W10 when you become Mods is it a prerequisite, to turn into a Primate?

We've been assimilated Pete.

telectrix · Nov 24, 2018

ah. the dreaded gorilla collective.

Pete999 · Nov 24, 2018

westward10 said:
We've been assimilated Pete.

telectrix said:
ah. the dreaded gorilla collective.

Crikey Tel, LSK and Darkwood are at it as well, didn't think much of it at the time, "Planet of the Apes" springs to Mind, this must be on GMES's instructions, time to change mine I think, not an Ape mind you, something more amiable.

n180 · Nov 24, 2018

It's 2 new circuits I've added for my stroma assessment. Just want to make sure I write the right stuff up with as little room as possible for inspector to catch me out.

So If I write NV for anything I'm not sure about, should be fine for old circuits? I'm not planning on running tests on old circuits, just the 2 new ones.

westward10 · Nov 24, 2018

If it is two new circuits just include those and nothing else. So if you have added say circuits 3 and 6, just list those on the schedule. Keep it simple no need for NV, NA or any of that business.

westward10 · Nov 24, 2018

Pete999 said:
Crikey Tel, LSK and Darkwood are at it as well, didn't think much of it at the time, "Planet of the Apes" springs to Mind, this must be on GMES's instructions, time to change mine I think, not an Ape mind you, something more amiable.

[ElectriciansForums.net] Schedule of results when adding to installation

Deleted member 26818 · Nov 24, 2018

I wouldn’t bother with NV.
Just put down the circuit details, type and rating of the protective device.
If the circuits are protected by an RCD that you have tested when adding your circuits, then include those results.
Anything that you haven’t tested or verified, leave blank.

Pete999 · Nov 24, 2018

telectrix said:
ah. the dreaded gorilla collective.

Troop, Mate Troop, or sometimes called a Whoop or Band, with a Dominant Male, or Silverback as some describe the leader of the Troop.

Risteard · Nov 24, 2018

westward10 said:
If it is two new circuits just include those and nothing else. So if you have added say circuits 3 and 6, just list those on the schedule. Keep it simple no need for NV, NA or any of that business.

Absolutely. I wouldn't be wasting my time listing circuits I haven't had any involvement with. In fact it could wrongly imply that I had done something to them.

Deleted member 9648 · Nov 24, 2018

One place to exercise caution when existing circuits go onto a schedule is number of points. Best to put N/V as it can be very difficult to accurately put a number to it. I was once on the receiving end of a complaint after various alterations to various existing circuits in an extremely cluttered house where much was inaccessible. A couple of years later new owners complained that my cert said X number of points when in fact there were Y number of points. A lesson learnt although I doubt many people would get quite as ---- over the number of points recorded on a cert as these people did.