LEighLeigh
DIY
Please help, just had a domestic EICR undertaken, a C2 issue: Consumer Unit does not meet minimum I.P rating, what does this mean and how do I check this out? how expensive to rectify? thanks!
Discuss C2 issues? Consumer Unit & Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
the CU has cable entry holes, these should not be > a certain sizeover and above the cables. . i.e. top is 1mm clearance. sides and bottom are finger size. if not too excessive, some filler would suffice to seal. a picture would helpPlease help, just had a domestic EICR undertaken, a C2 issue: Consumer Unit does not meet minimum I.P rating, what does this mean and how do I check this out? how expensive to rectify? thanks!
Yes apologies for that, what does this mean: Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC - is that a C2? He's put FI but in his text msg to me he says that it is a C2, confusedFrom the pic it is impossible to say the extent of the issue.
really appreciate the replay; what does this mean: Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC - do you come across this a lot?FI means further investigation. this leads to an unsatisfactory report, same as a C2, but in a different way.
as regards the CU IP rating. there are several methods costing very little. a piece of plastic could be cut to fit and glued over the offending hole/s. blue tak, filler.anything that would stop penetration of the enclosure to the relevant rating.basically one does not want a customer to be able to poke a finger in and come into contact with live parts.
It could mean that two RFC have been cross-connected, so instead of circuit 1 ends A and B going to MCB1 and circuit 2 ends A and B going to MCB2 you have 1A and 2A on MCB1 and 1B and 2B on MCB2.really appreciate the replay; what does this mean: Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC - do you come across this a lot?
It is indeedI see you're in Swansea... is the property also in Swansea?
OK if it really is just a loop connected to a 2nd loop, less of a concern than cross-linked RFCs.The fact it has been verified as a figure of eight means it doesn't need investigating (FI) it is what it is. A ring final circuit is as it says a ring or a circle a figure of eight is as it says an eight, just imagine them. Is it dangerous, no providing the connections are sound it is just non conventional but does indicate the circuit has undergone non compliant alterations.
Is there any way of telling from the EICR report?OK if it really is just a loop connected to a 2nd loop, less of a concern than cross-linked RFCs.
No, you would need to ask the electrician who did the inspection for some detail on that.Is there any way of telling from the EICR report?
I get the feeling I'm being a bit ripped off, particularly as I think they were lining me up to buy a new CU. What would I be able to go back with so I sound a bit more clued up?No, you would need to ask the electrician who did the inspection for some detail on that.
Given they have said circuit 6 presumably it is a single MCB involved so closer to @westward10 comment.
I guess that would cause the circuit to trip out more than usual?It is still not good for several reasons, one is you can't perform the usual RFC end-end checks and get all/most sockets connections verified that way.
Other point is unless you know where the loops touch you could end up with a lot more of the current on one leg of the circuit so potentially overloading the cable as the RFC typically uses 2.5mm cable rated at 20A (or so, depending on the installation method) but protected by 30A fuse or 32A MCB on the assumption of moderately sane load distribution.
Fixing the circuit is best answer, but if in doubt dropping the MCB to 20A at least removes the risk of cable overload.
Are you based in S Wales also?I see you're in Swansea... is the property also in Swansea?
Without seeing it we can't tell.I get the feeling I'm being a bit ripped off, particularly as I think they were lining me up to buy a new CU. What would I be able to go back with so I sound a bit more clued up?
Does it usually trip?I guess that would cause the circuit to trip out more than usual?
I think that is the answer then, drop the MCB to 20 ADoes it usually trip?
Unless you have all of the kitchen and rest of the house with heaters, etc, on the same RFC then you are unlikely to trip the MCB on over current at 20A. However, if it is the RCD that is tripping due to a selection of leaky electronics then the better solution would be a new CU with all RCBO so you don't have several circuits accumulation leakage to the point a common RCD trips.
Are you based in S Wales also?
It might be a solution but you still need to check all of the sockets are soundly connected. I suspect the 'FI' code is down to being unable to verify they are OK in the usual end-end test.I think that is the answer then, drop the MCB to 20 A
Reply to C2 issues? Consumer Unit & Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.