C2 issues? Consumer Unit & Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC? | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss C2 issues? Consumer Unit & Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Aug 19, 2022
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Location
Swansea
Please help, just had a domestic EICR undertaken, a C2 issue: Consumer Unit does not meet minimum I.P rating, what does this mean and how do I check this out? how expensive to rectify? thanks!
 
Please help, just had a domestic EICR undertaken, a C2 issue: Consumer Unit does not meet minimum I.P rating, what does this mean and how do I check this out? how expensive to rectify? thanks!
the CU has cable entry holes, these should not be > a certain sizeover and above the cables. . i.e. top is 1mm clearance. sides and bottom are finger size. if not too excessive, some filler would suffice to seal. a picture would help
p.
 
Unfortunately this is the only pic I have, not ideal ( I don't live in the property ), I'll try and get a better picture soon
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] C2 issues? Consumer Unit &  Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC?
    PXL_20220616_103158155.jpg
    394 KB · Views: 60
FI means further investigation. this leads to an unsatisfactory report, same as a C2, but in a different way.

as regards the CU IP rating. there are several methods costing very little. a piece of plastic could be cut to fit and glued over the offending hole/s. blue tak, filler.anything that would stop penetration of the enclosure to the relevant rating.basically one does not want a customer to be able to poke a finger in and come into contact with live parts.
 
FI means further investigation. this leads to an unsatisfactory report, same as a C2, but in a different way.

as regards the CU IP rating. there are several methods costing very little. a piece of plastic could be cut to fit and glued over the offending hole/s. blue tak, filler.anything that would stop penetration of the enclosure to the relevant rating.basically one does not want a customer to be able to poke a finger in and come into contact with live parts.
really appreciate the replay; what does this mean: Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC - do you come across this a lot?
 
The fact it has been verified as a figure of eight means it doesn't need investigating (FI) it is what it is. A ring final circuit is as it says a ring or a circle a figure of eight is as it says an eight, just imagine them. Is it dangerous, no providing the connections are sound it is just non conventional but does indicate the circuit has undergone non compliant alterations.
 
really appreciate the replay; what does this mean: Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC - do you come across this a lot?
It could mean that two RFC have been cross-connected, so instead of circuit 1 ends A and B going to MCB1 and circuit 2 ends A and B going to MCB2 you have 1A and 2A on MCB1 and 1B and 2B on MCB2.

It is quite dangerous as you now have 64A of total current before they trip on cable designed for a 32A circuit so a cable fault could result in serious damage or even a fire.

Less obvious is someone switches one MCB off to isolate the sockets and discovers in a careless way they are still live from MCB2. Careless in the sense they did not follow a proper safe isolation procedure to actually check the accessory they are working on really is dead.
 
The fact it has been verified as a figure of eight means it doesn't need investigating (FI) it is what it is. A ring final circuit is as it says a ring or a circle a figure of eight is as it says an eight, just imagine them. Is it dangerous, no providing the connections are sound it is just non conventional but does indicate the circuit has undergone non compliant alterations.
OK if it really is just a loop connected to a 2nd loop, less of a concern than cross-linked RFCs.
 
No, you would need to ask the electrician who did the inspection for some detail on that.

Given they have said circuit 6 presumably it is a single MCB involved so closer to @westward10 comment.
I get the feeling I'm being a bit ripped off, particularly as I think they were lining me up to buy a new CU. What would I be able to go back with so I sound a bit more clued up?
 
It is still not good for several reasons, one is you can't perform the usual RFC end-end checks and get all/most sockets connections verified that way.

Other point is unless you know where the loops touch you could end up with a lot more of the current on one leg of the circuit so potentially overloading the cable as the RFC typically uses 2.5mm cable rated at 20A (or so, depending on the installation method) but protected by 30A fuse or 32A MCB on the assumption of moderately sane load distribution.

Fixing the circuit is best answer, but if in doubt dropping the MCB to 20A at least removes the risk of cable overload.
 
It is still not good for several reasons, one is you can't perform the usual RFC end-end checks and get all/most sockets connections verified that way.

Other point is unless you know where the loops touch you could end up with a lot more of the current on one leg of the circuit so potentially overloading the cable as the RFC typically uses 2.5mm cable rated at 20A (or so, depending on the installation method) but protected by 30A fuse or 32A MCB on the assumption of moderately sane load distribution.

Fixing the circuit is best answer, but if in doubt dropping the MCB to 20A at least removes the risk of cable overload.
I guess that would cause the circuit to trip out more than usual?
 
I get the feeling I'm being a bit ripped off, particularly as I think they were lining me up to buy a new CU. What would I be able to go back with so I sound a bit more clued up?
Without seeing it we can't tell.

You could get more photos to show the CU and any holes for cable (or other damage) and post them here.

If @SparkyChick cover your area then she is an excellent choice for a 2nd opinion, but it might just get the same answer but now 2 EICR costs and same remedial expense.

More info and guidance can be found for free in the Best Practice Guide #4 here:
https://www.----------------------------/professional-resources/best-practice-guides/
 
Last edited:
I guess that would cause the circuit to trip out more than usual?
Does it usually trip?

Unless you have all of the kitchen and rest of the house with heaters, etc, on the same RFC then you are unlikely to trip the MCB on over current at 20A. However, if it is the RCD that is tripping due to a selection of leaky electronics then the better solution would be a new CU with all RCBO so you don't have several circuits accumulation leakage to the point a common RCD trips.
 
Does it usually trip?

Unless you have all of the kitchen and rest of the house with heaters, etc, on the same RFC then you are unlikely to trip the MCB on over current at 20A. However, if it is the RCD that is tripping due to a selection of leaky electronics then the better solution would be a new CU with all RCBO so you don't have several circuits accumulation leakage to the point a common RCD trips.
I think that is the answer then, drop the MCB to 20 A
 
I think that is the answer then, drop the MCB to 20 A
It might be a solution but you still need to check all of the sockets are soundly connected. I suspect the 'FI' code is down to being unable to verify they are OK in the usual end-end test.

Do you know of any work on the sockets since the installation / last inspection that might explain this?

Looking at the photo there are two circuits (at least, MCB fitted) that as marked as "spare". Are they really unused or just not properly documented?
 

Reply to C2 issues? Consumer Unit & Circuit forms a Figure of 8 Rather than a complete RFC? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
I am posting an additional note in case it's useful to anyone in a similar situation: the whole thing is made more confused by the fact that I -...
Replies
11
Views
4K
First one drove by , sucked his teeth , muttered under his breath 'ah looks okay from here'
Replies
21
Views
5K
Hi, My probe was on the outgoing neutral of the RCBO. I will be testing again this week so I will play around, many thanks for your reply.
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Question
It's quite usual for the mods to delete a reply/post if its too an old thread, happens to me often 🥴 they then notify me and tell me not to answer...
Replies
34
Views
6K
the important thing is to do it safely. OK you may be a bit rusty on the regs, but the basics haven't altered. and i didn't know about the 32A...
Replies
6
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks