can this produce useful electric energy?

justcurioustwo · May 14, 2023

file:///C:/Users/Tom/Desktop/SeaEngine/SEAPOWER48.jpg
Once all the bubbles are full of air, all you need to do is fill the lowest one to keep all the other air bubbles pulling together multiplying the upward force.

[ElectriciansForums.net] can this produce useful electric energy?

mainline · May 18, 2023

justcurioustwo said:
I have heard that same, "no it can't" before and in every case no one could produce "any" evidence to show it can not work.
My guess is they don't have a clue.

Then you need to prove them wrong.
I also suggest having a read up on how to deal with disappointment.

DPG · May 18, 2023

justcurioustwo said:
I have heard that same, "no it can't" before and in every case no one could produce "any" evidence to show it can not work.
My guess is they don't have a clue.

It's for you to prove that it does work. Not the other way round.

Can I ask what response you have had from other people/forums/ etc that you have asked? It's a scientific engineering question rather than an electrical one.

nicebutdim · May 18, 2023

justcurioustwo said:
I have heard that same, "no it can't" before and in every case no one could produce "any" evidence to show it can not work.
My guess is they don't have a clue.

You've also responded in the same manner in each of those instances.

I get that you're convinced of the availability of free energy, which can be obtained with no additional input and no losses during extraction, but you seem to be missing a few vital points.

If someone reading your threads was in a position to fill in the blanks, what makes you think they'd hand that information over to some random person on an internet forum.

Maybe your ideas are ingenious and everyone here is too thick to recognise that.

Maybe everyone here already benefits from an abundance of free energy, but understands the risks associated with open dissemination of that information... or we're too greedy to share it.

Maybe your proposal isn't feasible.

Regardless of which of the above possibilities rings true, continually posting the same questions and then engaging in argument doesn't appear to be furthering your ambition, so I guess it all boils down to the same thing - go it alone or give up.

I'd really like to see you build a working prototype, but fully understand why you might choose to keep future research confidential.

Good luck in your endeavours.

mainline · May 18, 2023

MJPD29 · May 18, 2023

mainline said:
Then you need to prove them wrong.
I also suggest having a read up on how to deal with disappointment.

Multiple pints is usually a good starter

mainline · May 18, 2023

MJPD29 said:
Multiple pints is usually a good starter

The price of one certainly for me causes even more disappointment.

Fazz711 · May 19, 2023

Perpetual motion machine LoL

justcurioustwo · May 20, 2023

plugsandsparks said:
Well thats where you're wrong. From the last time i decided to build one, it is currently powering this computer and have had interest from BP. Currently in negotiations on the patent of my unique solution. BP are prepared to buy me out - so i can retire.
Will let you know how i get on.

I gtive you all my rights to my seaengine idea.

justcurioustwo · May 20, 2023

nicebutdim said:
I get that you're convinced of the availability of free energy, which can be obtained with no additional input and no losses during extraction, but you seem to be missing a few vital points.

There is no free energy in this process. You must continuously add more air at the bottom for it to continue. What I believe makes this work is the unifying process. In the illustration ten (10) balloons are pulling and to maintain this unified process all that you need to do to continue is add one (1) at bottom.

plugsandsparks · May 21, 2023

Exactly right, the secret is how you fill the bottom balloon at 19Bar, this is the crux of my patent, there is a little known creature that is capable of using the latent heat of seawater and breathing out Co2 at 19.2 Bar. The creatures are proving a little challenging to convince BP they can reliably delivering their end of deal. Sadly BP are currently holding back until their due diligence proves i have a reliable working relationship with said creatures.
Due to language barriers the BP lawyers don't understand them, negotiations continue around the selection of a mutually acceptable translator.
Wish me luck

littlespark · Apr 4, 2024

RomeoMata said:
Hey everyone! Just stumbled upon this intriguing discussion!

Welcome to the forum…..

And what did you get out of the discussion….. apart from;

“It will work”

“No, it won’t”

“Yes it will”

“No, it won’t”

Julie. · Apr 4, 2024

littlespark said:
Welcome to the forum…..

And what did you get out of the discussion….. apart from;

“It will work”

“No, it won’t”

“Yes it will”

“No, it won’t”

Let me re-phrase that for you:

"I don't understand basic physics "

"Here's a clear explanation of why it won't work "

"I think it will because I don't understand basic physics "

"Here's another clear explanation of why it won't work with easy to understand examples"

"Perhaps, but I don't understand basic physics "

DPG · Apr 4, 2024

Julie. said:
Let me re-phrase that for you:

"I don't understand basic physics "

"Here's a clear explanation of why it won't work "

"I think it will because I don't understand basic physics "

"Here's another clear explanation of why it won't work with easy to understand examples"

"Perhaps, but I don't understand basic physics "