I have heard that same, "no it can't" before and in every case no one could produce "any" evidence to show it can not work.
My guess is they don't have a clue.
You've also responded in the same manner in each of those instances.
I get that you're convinced of the availability of free energy, which can be obtained with no additional input and no losses during extraction, but you seem to be missing a few vital points.
If someone reading your threads was in a position to fill in the blanks, what makes you think they'd hand that information over to some random person on an internet forum.
Maybe your ideas are ingenious and everyone here is too thick to recognise that.
Maybe everyone here already benefits from an abundance of free energy, but understands the risks associated with open dissemination of that information... or we're too greedy to share it.
Maybe your proposal isn't feasible.
Regardless of which of the above possibilities rings true, continually posting the same questions and then engaging in argument doesn't appear to be furthering your ambition, so I guess it all boils down to the same thing - go it alone or give up.
I'd really like to see you build a working prototype, but fully understand why you might choose to keep future research confidential.
Good luck in your endeavours.