I came across this at a customer's place.
Semi - enclosed ceramic but it pre-dates BS3036. The iron break-out (yes it is is bonded..) enclosure is "Callender" branded and dates from when the house was built (1930's).
I will pull the fuse next visit and measure/check the wire diameter. I am expecting 60A but not sure. The Callender brand ceramic holder says "Carry 30, 60 blow" but that will be pretty meaningless. The customer says the fuse blew some years ago and was replaced. (I have checked - it does contain a fuse and not a nail.
I could replace the wire next visit with known 60A so I can correctly document it ? - But that belongs to DNO and not my bit to alter. Would you do this - or just rely on the Vernier & 533.1.1.3 ? DNO seemed happy with the fuse (by visual inspection only isofar as there was one!) without even checking it - see later.
60 A is adequate for the customer (with a little constructive diversity) and is limited to that anyway by 16mm tails to the meter.
I shall probably assume the worst-case for short-circuit capacity of newer BS3036 S1A type (ie 1KA). - This still covers me for the measured PFC.
Installation is TNS, lead sheathed supply cable with double layer spiral steel banding.
I had the DNO round before touching anything to provide the installation with a new MET clamped to the lead sheath since first thing I did was measure 8 Ohms Ze. (There was no MET, and a teeny single strand Cu wire earthing conductor wrapped round the sheath and probably corroded) - Now a better figure Ze (0.33) from which to begin.
I was very surprised that DNO guy said they have changed their policy recently, and now they won't replace break-outs like this even if they are 80 years old.
But what type of fuse do I record? (For supply protective device in EIC) ? I could just put "semi-enclosed fuse", 60A (TBC after inspection), and assume 1KA rated short circuit capacity. - Would that be reasonable?
Semi - enclosed ceramic but it pre-dates BS3036. The iron break-out (yes it is is bonded..) enclosure is "Callender" branded and dates from when the house was built (1930's).
I will pull the fuse next visit and measure/check the wire diameter. I am expecting 60A but not sure. The Callender brand ceramic holder says "Carry 30, 60 blow" but that will be pretty meaningless. The customer says the fuse blew some years ago and was replaced. (I have checked - it does contain a fuse and not a nail.
I could replace the wire next visit with known 60A so I can correctly document it ? - But that belongs to DNO and not my bit to alter. Would you do this - or just rely on the Vernier & 533.1.1.3 ? DNO seemed happy with the fuse (by visual inspection only isofar as there was one!) without even checking it - see later.
60 A is adequate for the customer (with a little constructive diversity) and is limited to that anyway by 16mm tails to the meter.
I shall probably assume the worst-case for short-circuit capacity of newer BS3036 S1A type (ie 1KA). - This still covers me for the measured PFC.
Installation is TNS, lead sheathed supply cable with double layer spiral steel banding.
I had the DNO round before touching anything to provide the installation with a new MET clamped to the lead sheath since first thing I did was measure 8 Ohms Ze. (There was no MET, and a teeny single strand Cu wire earthing conductor wrapped round the sheath and probably corroded) - Now a better figure Ze (0.33) from which to begin.
I was very surprised that DNO guy said they have changed their policy recently, and now they won't replace break-outs like this even if they are 80 years old.
But what type of fuse do I record? (For supply protective device in EIC) ? I could just put "semi-enclosed fuse", 60A (TBC after inspection), and assume 1KA rated short circuit capacity. - Would that be reasonable?
Last edited: