Daily Mail B******x Again - What to do with these guys?

Worcester · Feb 15, 2014

Was given today's daily mail by a neighbour - he didn't understand the article - see attached

Headline: How Money Saving Solar Panels actually increased my heating bill by £220

Yet the actual article was NOTHING about solar panels - the problem related to a bunch of badly designed, and clearly incorrectly installed A2W heat pumps aka 'Boilers' ....

Headline doesn't match up with any of the problems in the story...

[ElectriciansForums.net] Daily Mail B******x Again - What to do with these guys?

Marvo · Feb 15, 2014

I think you're making the incorrect assumption that the truth or journalistic integrity should trump a crowd pleasing headline.

Geordie Spark · Feb 15, 2014

Worcester said:
Was given today's daily mail by a neighbour - he didn't understand the article - see attached

Headline: How Money Saving Solar Panels actually increased my heating bill by £220

Yet the actual article was NOTHING about solar panels - the problem related to a bunch of badly designed, and clearly incorrectly installed A2W heat pumps aka 'Boilers' ....

Headline doesn't match up with any of the problems in the story...
View attachment 22867 View attachment 22868

Take no notice - it's a bloody awful paper written by jacked-up school kids who can't spell and think grammar is an elderly female relative.

They don't even have an indecent page 3 either.

Gavin A · Feb 15, 2014

so, it's a bad heat pump installation, but the blame is placed on the solar panels and the words 'heat pump' aren't used in the entire article?

or did they also have meters with anti-temper setting that clocks up the energy in both directions?

ferg · Feb 15, 2014

They know exactly what they are doing when they write articles that way.

What does that tell you about how they think of their readers?

Gavin A · Feb 15, 2014

stickers currently appearing on UK trains...

Adam W · Feb 15, 2014

Doesn't the article state they were installed incorrectly?

trev · Feb 15, 2014

If I read in the daily fail that it was raining I'd look outside to check whether they were lying or not.

UNG · Feb 15, 2014

Why pick on one paper they all print factual nonsense that ain't worth the cover price even when it's free

SolarCity · Feb 16, 2014

Daily Mail - unresearched, half-witted opinion and hysteria. It is impossible for me to put in to words how much I loathe this vile rag.

trev · Feb 16, 2014

UNG said:
Why pick on one paper they all print factual nonsense that ain't worth the cover price even when it's free

Because not even the red tops can match the daily fail for printing hysterical right wing nonsense and their fanatical devotion to a loathsome political party

UNG · Feb 16, 2014

trev said:
Because not even the red tops can match the daily fail for printing hysterical right wing nonsense and their fanatical devotion to a loathsome political party

Where is the News of the World these days didn't they do something illegal along with a few of the other red tops then there's the dockers comic and the reporting of Hillsborough they are all as bad as each other and some of the red tops you like so much are frightened that if they don't swing both ways politically they will miss out on something.

In short they are all not worth the waste of paper and ink used to print them or the webspace taken for the online versions no matter what their political persuasion is and you won't convince me otherwise

thekingiam · Feb 16, 2014

i like the daily mail so there!.----.-----........

The Solar King · Feb 16, 2014

They do seem to have a very perverse agenda. As I understand, most readers buy it for the crossword.

Just how idiotic these excuses for hacks are can be seen in their article on the 'blight' of solar farms. They took an aerial shot of a farm and printed it on their toilet paper along with a dispariging article. In their online version it was a bigger photo showing it was right next door to Fawley oil refinery! If you visit the area you will be hard pushed to find it as it is so well obscured by hedges etc.

So doff your caps boys. This paper isn't even last century, but the one before.

trev · Feb 16, 2014

UNG said:
Where is the News of the World these days didn't they do something illegal along with a few of the other red tops then there's the dockers comic and the reporting of Hillsborough they are all as bad as each other and some of the red tops you like so much are frightened that if they don't swing both ways politically they will miss out on something.

In short they are all not worth the waste of paper and ink used to print them or the webspace taken for the online versions no matter what their political persuasion is and you won't convince me otherwise

NOTW was taken down because Rupert Murdoch realised he, via his hacks, had gone too far but yes I agree the red tops are all as bad as each other but where did I say I liked them?

The fact of the matter is that the daily fail is the press wing of Iain Duncan Smith and his ilk, they take pleasure in demonising defenceless sectors of society. The founder of the paper, Lord Rossemere (I might have the spelling wrong but you'll know who he was) was photographed shaking hands with Hitler and printed an editorial praising him, the political views espoused in that rag have not moved since then.

Daily Mail B******x Again - What to do with these guys?

Worcester

-

Marvo

-

Geordie Spark

Gavin A

-

ferg

-

Gavin A

-

Adam W

trev

UNG

-

SolarCity

-

trev

UNG

-

thekingiam

The Solar King

-

trev

News and Offers from Sponsors

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

YOUR Unread Posts