I'm thinking, and while I could be wrong, is the adiabatic method a possible latent safety hazard? As well as undersized CPCs on circuits 32 amps and under?
Normally DNO sources are strong with relatively high PFC, and we have a known Ze value. However, should someone bring a portable...
Right, but I'd imagine there is some specific table in one of the IEC standards.
Basically I want to quantify body impedance in 3 environments:
1) Dry (general indoor locations)
2) wet (bathrooms, kitchens, unfinished basements, garages, exteriors)
3) special locations (pools, spays, medical...
I'd argue the UK public is among the most educated on earth. If given listed appliances with a note "do no use in shower or bathtub" I'd trust everyone would follow through. At least they do in the US.
How would a listed hair dryer be dangerous when its double insulated? Having an outlet by the sink and within two feet of the shower is common and no one I know has ever gotten hurt. A typical example:
I'd argue not having a socket in the bathroom increases the odds of an extension lead being used.
I personally see no issue with a socket reasonably placed outside the tub perimeter.
It does on the basis that BS7671 fails to require a faster disconnection time.
IEC61200-413 assumes 200 ohms in wet locations and allows for a maximum of 0.17 seconds.
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc