Where would I find that warning then? These are MEM 3871 M6 type 2 MCBs. Have looked on the Eaton website, and found their MCB literature but unable to find any specific warning about excessive PFC.
Customer is not rushing to sort this out, but wants to speak with me next week about it. Assuming for the moment that the measured value of Ze=0.01 ohms is correct, I am trying to establish what can potentially be done about this. To recap: TN-S, the DB circuit breakers are 6kA SCC, the DNO fuse...
On a split load board, with two RCDs, you can move circuits from one RCD to the other (physical constraints re cable lengths allowing) to balance out the 'normal leakage'. For example, if the underfloor heating, cooker and kitchen sockets were on the same RCD, then move one or two of them to the...
farmelectrics, look at the front of a MCB. It should have two sets of specification information (beyond BS numbers and manufacturer's ID info). A typical example might be B6A (indicating a 6A breaker as typically used for overcurrent protection on a domestic lighting circuit) and 6000 (or 6kA)...
I stand corrected then, if RCDs can hold in when no power is applied. Yet I'm sure I've come across at least one where it would not hold in until power was connected. It was either Mem Eaton or Wylex. I usually switch off MCBs and RCDs before cutting the power using the mainswitch, so not been...
If I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying that with the rcbo in your hand i.e. NOT connected to a power supply, you try to switch it from 'off' to 'on'. You are expecting it to remain in the 'on' position, but find that it doesn't, instead the switch automatically returns to the 'off'...
Surely you would test RFC continuity under a EICR? Or are you suggesting there may be particular circumstances under which a LIM could be applied instead of doing these particular tests? If so, then how about a couple of examples?
Came across this last week. For some reason the MET has not been used, and the main earth to the consumer unit and the main bonding to the water service have both been connected direct onto the cable sheath using a BS951 type clamp. Any ideas why the MET might not have been used? And opinions...
These measurements were made and recorded by someone else. I was just shown the PIR and had a quick look around. There are other issues with the PIR where recorded readings (or no readings were recorded!) do not ring true. Premises were in use at the time so was not possible to take my own...
Was shown a PIR by a friend today where the Ze was recorded as 0.01 ohms. Not unexpectedly, the PFC was sky high at 19.9kA. I have never come across a Ze so low before. This is commercial premises, with a single phase TN-S supply. Now the nearest substation I am aware of is 150m away as the crow...
Tel, as he is replacing like with like and not running new circuits or altering the characteristics of the existing circuit, then there is a valid argument that RCD protection is not required. Naturally, it would be preferable to have RCD protection, but not absolutely necessary in this case...
Stoutlad, it sounds like you have done a pretty thorough job as far as you are able to. Unfortunately it is now time to call in the experts who will have proper test equipment. It might possibly be the MCB (trip switch as you called it) or it may be some kind of fault in the cables supplying the...
Got my replacement leads (for my MFT1552) from ISSWWW in Norwich
MEG 1001-860 TEST LEAD 6220-796 6220-770 £30 inc VAT
Slightly different to the original ones, slightly better in my opinion.
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc