1.5mm SWA, Acceptable or bad practice ? | Page 4 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss 1.5mm SWA, Acceptable or bad practice ? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Oooooh no, you couldn't do that. A 1.5mm ring? Who's ever heard of such a thing, that can't be good practice, there's no diagrams showing that anywhere... ;):):D

I know, lowest form. But that's what it comes down to in the end, that's what you've been taught so you're set rigid in your ways.
 
I know it depends on its inststallation method but what is the max current carrying capacity of 1.5mm swa 3 core?

If im looking at the correct table 4D4A it says 18a clipped direct.

But then this manufactures spec says 32a. (page 3) http://www.alertelectrical.com/upload/pdf/329armoured.pdf


I want to know if its acceptable to run a radial to 2 x outdoor sockets using 1.5mm SWA on a 16a mcb


Look at appendix 15 in the BRB
 
I'm with you on this one pevvers..

No one has yet given a valid reason and explained why they wouldnt use 1.5mm SWA on a 16a MCB, or even 20A MCB for that reason.
looks like youve answered your own question then sid :rolleyes:

also the cable you mention carries 21 amps in the brb before any cable calcs :p
 
Last edited:
Ummmm, am I protecting the cable from overcurrents?

Yes.

Whether it be lighting, sockets, FCU's, it matters not as long as the cable and all associated equipment is protected from overcurrents, will disconnect in the required time, etc., etc.

Just because it's 1.5 doesn't mean it can only be used for lighting, just like you could put in 16mm radial circuits for sockets if you really liked, although you would have a hell of a time getting them in the terminals!!

As long as the calculations add up then you are complying with BS7671, which is what I adhere to.


well said
 
Hi there, after reading this discussion it seems to me that some people are happy to use a cable size with a capacity barely above the nominal value of the MCB. Personally the reason I would go for a larger SWA in this case is because a 16A MCB may not trip until well over 20A, maybe 22A, according to Appendix 3 of the BRB. This brings your tolerance down significantly, and if there is any place along the run which causes the cable to derate, ie fed through bunches, under insulation etc, then the capacity of the cable may drop below the MCB trip current, and then you may have a problem. It's all about perceived risk I guess.
 
Couldnt be bothered to trawl through all the posts so sorry if I'm going over whats already been said.

Do the calcs & if all complies then just use the 1.5mm, nothing wrong with 1.5mm used for sso's if it complies.

Just because the norm is 2.5 don't mean you have to use it after all what size conductors would you use for sso radial circuit if MI was the cable of the day & you are thinking of proffits in the job.

Dont be drawn into this is the norm & this is how we have to do it, thats why your taught how to calculate cable selections :rolleyes:
 
Couldnt be bothered to trawl through all the posts so sorry if I'm going over whats already been said.

Do the calcs & if all complies then just use the 1.5mm, nothing wrong with 1.5mm used for sso's if it complies.

Just because the norm is 2.5 don't mean you have to use it after all what size conductors would you use for sso radial circuit if MI was the cable of the day & you are thinking of proffits in the job.

Dont be drawn into this is the norm & this is how we have to do it, thats why your taught how to calculate cable selections :rolleyes:

here here

thou shalt not rely on the on-site-guide!!!
 
Couldnt be bothered to trawl through all the posts so sorry if I'm going over whats already been said.

Do the calcs & if all complies then just use the 1.5mm, nothing wrong with 1.5mm used for sso's if it complies.

Just because the norm is 2.5 don't mean you have to use it after all what size conductors would you use for sso radial circuit if MI was the cable of the day & you are thinking of proffits in the job.

Dont be drawn into this is the norm & this is how we have to do it, thats why your taught how to calculate cable selections :rolleyes:
now MI is a totally different ball game, op was for opinions and thats what he got :rolleyes:
 

Reply to 1.5mm SWA, Acceptable or bad practice ? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
298
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
807
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
848

Similar threads

A picture paints a thousand words so here's an SLD showing my installation and some annotations to show the proposed relocation of the DC...
Replies
12
Views
1K
Just stick the 63amp fused connector before the Henley block , or Lucy block as you call it, and your all good, as for your 2nd point, , the...
Replies
1
Views
997

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top