Have you ever come across a melted 16mm tail ? Me , no never ...
why are tails expected to be 25mm , seems utter overkill imo
thoughts
why are tails expected to be 25mm , seems utter overkill imo
thoughts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Discuss 25mm tails why..? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
Some suppliers send in the clowns to pull a fuse and don't put the fuse size on the it when changing the meter.tails etc then the supply fuse size would be confirmed.
But sometimes they get the polarity right so that makes it OK...Some suppliers send in the clowns to pull a fuse and don't put the fuse size on the it when changing the meter.
I have actually never come across a melted 10mm tail and still occasionally come across 6mm tails.Have you ever come across a melted 16mm tail ? Me , no never ...
why are tails expected to be 25mm , seems utter overkill imo
thoughts
I have actually never come across a melted 10mm tail and still occasionally come across 6mm tails.
Yes I agree however it goes against the regs by using 16mm tails on 80A/100A fuseif I had my way 16mm tails we be the norm for all domestic property.
25mm is total overkill imo...
interesting. so if the fuse is, as you say, to protect the DNO's cable etc., then the tails are not, themselved protected. only downstream in the CU, and indirectly by the actual max. load that may be relevant at any one time. therefore, using 25mm tails just because the DNO fuse is 100A is not justifiable. tin hat on by a guy who regularly fits 16mm tails.The way I look at 100amp cutout is a fused circuit so cabling has to be suited to that circuit 25mm, as 16mm from memory is only rated at 92amps.
Having said that the fuse is there to protect the suppliers equipment .
From a quick look most places seem to use the same table in their literature, even the cable makers - though the one in the OSG seems to suggest it's more for Twin and Earth, not singles (with the 2 cables reference), Though if they are run cable tied together that probably has no effect anyway.interesting. so if the fuse is, as you say, to protect the DNO's cable etc., then the tails are not, themselved protected. only downstream in the CU, and indirectly by the actual max. load that may be relevant at any one time. therefore, using 25mm tails just because the DNO fuse is 100A is not justifiable. tin hat on by a guy who regularly fits 16mm tails.
you say 92A for 16mm, but according to table F4(i) in osg ( green 17th ed), no figures are given for 16mm single cables in free air (ref. method F). 25mm CCC has a 45% highr rating method F as opposed to methoc C, which woulf extrapolate for 16mm as 114A.
Page 356 BYB flat and touching.Prysmian give 87 for 16mm and 114 for 25mm (clipped direct) but
Is there a good reason why they don't give ratings for 16mm for Reference Method F in table 4D1A in BBB or F4(i) in OSG? Is 16mm single core not approved for Ref Method F installation or something?Page 356 BYB flat and touching.
that's clipped direct, method C. most CU tails are method F , free air.Just looked up the technical data of some cable manufactures, 16mm tails rated at 87A , just saying.
Reply to 25mm tails why..? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net