415.2.2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss 415.2.2 in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

the pict

-
Mentor
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,194
Reaction score
292
Location
Brodick
Re the above regulation would an example of this be: the exposed conductive part of an electric towel rail IE the towel rail itself, and a extraneous exposed condutive part say a basin tap, so between these two points the reading shold not exceed 1667 ohms or have I missunderstood
Pict
 
Cheers malcolm I have just been re-reading the NICEIC toolbox guide and the 4 criterion seem to contracdict the common held opinion that any 0ne of the 4 can exclude supp bonding but on reading all 4 must apply befrore supp bonding can be omitted ??
Pict
 
all 3 of the conditions in 701.415.2 must be met in order to omit supp. bonding in the special location.
 
Cheers Telectrix having read it again and this thread it is clear now the only condition I think is going to be an issue is the 411.3.1.2,
Pict
 
why ? alll that states is that the incoming services must be bonded to the MET
 
The one that has always annoyed me about the conditions for excemption for supplementary bonding is:
(i) All final circuits of the location comply with the requirements for automatic disconnection according to Regulation 411.3.2.
Now I would assume that this requires the Zs to be low enough for an overcurrent device to operate within 0.4s for TN, and 0.2s for TT.
However, 411.3.2 allows for the disconnection times to be achieved by use of a 30mA RCD and RCD protection for the circuit is another condition which is required to be met.
I think this condition should either be removed, or if it is to require the Zs are low enough to allow an overcurrent device to operate in the prescribed times, it should be more clear
 
Maybe Iam overly concerned about nothing although when the rooms were being refurbed there was a lot of bonding conductors in the skip

Pict


lol
You never know,this could become an ultimate condition to ommit the bonding
icon14.png


icon7.png


Sorry for that,small things amuse me unfortunately
icon11.png
 
I think it was the plumbers interpretation of bonding an extraneous conductive part as some conductors were still attached to some copper pipe and a towel rail and wrppaed round the lifting lugs of the skip
Pict
 

Reply to 415.2.2 in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Hi everyone, If you are looking for reliable EV chargers, check out our top-rated selection at E2GO! ⚡ Please note that all EV Chargers and...
Replies
0
Views
124
  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
910
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Question
When I was at college doing the 2361 back in the 1980's I still recall to this day the instructor (Mr Wood) saying "Lads I do not want you to...
Replies
10
Views
678
If you can see a piece of plastic entering from the ground then (as cliff said), it does not need main bonding. I think (not sure) this is reg...
Replies
3
Views
450

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top