Additional protection | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Additional protection in the Talk Electrician area at ElectriciansForums.net

W

Waynem

We have installed 230v bus bar track fitted in a floor void in an office block. These tracks supply the standard floor box outlets. The protective device is a standard BSEN 60898 MCB. I'm struggling to find out how this complies with the 17th edition regs. I was under the assumption that all sockets with a rating of up to 20A had to have additional protection. Any ideas?
 
I could make a case for compliance where the installation is used by employees and is (as required by the electricity at Work Regulations 1989) under the control of a skilled or instructed person.

The exception here is sockets that can be used by members of the public, such as in an internet cafe to power the customer's own laptop etc. and (the main reason for the RCD requirement) socket outlets in a domestic situation.

The exception was introduced because installations under the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 have to ensure that workplace equipment is safe and that systems are adequately maintained.
 
Last edited:
also being used for computers it possibly needs an high integrity CPC plus the earth leakage from them all could cause the RCD to nuisance trip if one was fitted.
 
also being used for computers it possibly needs an high integrity CPC plus the earth leakage from them all could cause the RCD to nuisance trip if one was fitted.

You might find that the busbar meets the requirements for high integrity earthing while the possibility of nuisance tripping is a design problem rather than an additional reason to omit the RCD protection.
 
Thanks.
I did think that this may be the case. However, if you can't guarantee that the person is skilled or instructed surely the designer should err on the side of caution. There are cleaners that regularly plug into these floor boxes, Would these staff be classed as skilled or instructed? There are other design issues also. there appears to be nothing protecting the 2.5mm cable that connects the floor box to the bus bar track. With a 63A mcb poviding the only protection the possibilities for severe over load obvious. Think i'll be contacting the designer!
 
We install a lot of power track systems over here and all the track is protected by normal BS 60898 MCBs basically to
1 avoid RCD protection for the entire track
2. High protective conductor currents.

We normally fit BS 7288 RCD sockets on the majority of the tap off points, and normal sockets for larger ink jet printers, etc that are not normally portable.

Again Like IQ say it is regarded as it is an office/commericla enviroment that it is under the supervision of skilled or instructed persons
 
Thanks.
I did think that this may be the case. However, if you can't guarantee that the person is skilled or instructed surely the designer should err on the side of caution. There are cleaners that regularly plug into these floor boxes, Would these staff be classed as skilled or instructed? There are other design issues also. there appears to be nothing protecting the 2.5mm cable that connects the floor box to the bus bar track. With a 63A mcb poviding the only protection the possibilities for severe over load obvious. Think i'll be contacting the designer!

Normally provision would be made for 'cleaners sockets' which should be RCD protected due to the nature of use, as for the 2.5mm busbar feeds, a 63A device is certainly not acceptable.
 
Thanks.
I did think that this may be the case. However, if you can't guarantee that the person is skilled or instructed surely the designer should err on the side of caution. There are cleaners that regularly plug into these floor boxes, Would these staff be classed as skilled or instructed? There are other design issues also. there appears to be nothing protecting the 2.5mm cable that connects the floor box to the bus bar track. With a 63A mcb poviding the only protection the possibilities for severe over load obvious. Think i'll be contacting the designer!


Normally if your tap off point is under 3 mts then there is no need to protect the tap off cable, but then the track is normally rated at 32amp only.

If you have a 63amp track then you can normally only able to fit 63amp leads, which are normally colour coded, say grey for 32amp and green 63amp, and all the 63 amp taqp offs are fused. So chect that.
 

Reply to Additional protection in the Talk Electrician area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
Thanks for all comments still debating how to solve this, i personally would install MCB, having an idea the cable is installed under...
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Question
Leaves the potential nuisance of knocking off a raft of equipment unnecessarily
Replies
7
Views
890
Some of the points should have been picked up by previous people doing the testing. Sounds like this is a thorough report. Not everything is...
Replies
11
Views
2K
Thanks Dave, I appreciate the reply as I knew it was something I wasn’t picking up.I’ll read up in the regs book on an IT supply as Can’t say I’ve...
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Question
To put it simply the generator cannot provide enough current to operate and mcb as fault protection. To deal with this we make use of RCDs of...
Replies
7
Views
2K
davesparks
D

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks