Because by definition basic protection stops the flow of current and also by definition an RCD provides basic protection regulation 131.2.1 says it does,
Where does Regulation 131.2.1 state or even imply that an RCD provides basic protection?

Also I would suggest that basic protection prevents you from coming into contact with live parts as opposed to stopping the flow of current. (We used to refer to it as protection against direct contact.)
 
Don't get me wrong I totally understand the principle I'm simply pointing out the ambiguity of the regs
But I don't accept that it is in any way ambiguous. That's why I am asking where precisely you believe that the Regulation in question supports your claim.
 
The title of reg 131.2.1 is : Basic protection (protection against direct contact)
I know I'm simple, but I don't need to think much beyond that do I? :)
 
But it states you can achieve it by reducing the current to a non hazardous level I would like to know how, and if an RCD can't do it what can
 
Why is an RCD designed to detect 30mA there is a reason, because fault currents start at zero and climb in a time curve. And at 30mA we want it off and quick
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Lincolnshire

Thread Information

Title
Automatic disconnection of supply
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
59

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
rich3009,
Last reply from
Amp David,
Replies
59
Views
7,421

Advert

Back
Top