bonding structural steel buried within fabric of building | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss bonding structural steel buried within fabric of building in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

ExArmy

-
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
716
Reaction score
143
Location
cumbria
was in a half finished house today that has just had an extension built on it, and i was suprised to see 10mm bonding to the steel RSJs that span the garage and where the kitchen has been knocked through and at the front where a porch has been created. traced them back to the MET, have all been labelled up "extraneous steel work"
they have been boarded and will be plastered when finished so they won't be exposed, is it really necessary to do this. I think not but i though i would mention it here see what you guys think
 
Any structural steelwork, that forms a part of or fully the structure of the building, that is tied in to the re-bar of the foundations Should Always be bonded back to the MET of the incoming supply. Even if it's not actually exposed to touch, which can't always be guaranteed during the life of building, it will improve your installations Zs!! lol!!!

none of the steel RSJs are in any way tied to the re bar in the foundations, and, there isn't any re bar in the foundations in this particular house
the steel RSJs are infact just mortar bedded onto concrete padstones thats were built into the walls, so they will not help the ZS in any way.


You don't sit structural steelwork on mortar beds mate, they are normally set in, or bolted to reinforced foundations!! ...If your unsure if it is extraneous, then you can always test it, but it's a mistake to ignore it!!!

maybe in commercial or industry, but in domestic dwellings it is common to mortar bed steels onto concrete padstones (normally a 6X4 dense concrete lintel chopped into 300mm lenghts)
maybe sometimes if it needs it vertical steels are put in place to support along the length or instead of block pillars, but then they would only go down as far as damp course level and would be bolted to about a metre of concrete, so they would not really alter the ZS as they dont go into the ground
theres certainlly not going to be any tying in to the re-bar in a domestic dwelling founds, for a start re bar in domestic founds is quite rare, and secondly most steels are additions anyway. and even in new builds i've never seen it.
 
You need to read my posts above, i didn't say your situation was tied in to the foundation reinforcement. You gave very little information, i was pointing out where and when situations!! What's a lintels and concrete pads, it certainly isn't a mortar bed is it?? If you knew how these RSJ's were installed, why didn't you mention it in the first place??

As for your comment on not using reinforced foundations in the UK for housing, i'm afraid you would be wrong, in many instances that would be the only course of achieving a stable base for a building. I know of many areas where housing estates are All built on reinforced foundations. It all very much depends on the the ground your building on!!

So, ....Did you test these RSJ's before dismissing them, as not being extraneous??
 
You need to read my posts above, i didn't say your situation was tied in to the foundation reinforcement. You gave very little information, i was pointing out where and when situations!! What's a lintels and concrete pads, it certainly isn't a mortar bed is it?? If you knew how these RSJ's were installed, why didn't you mention it in the first place??

a concrete lintel is used to go over the top of windows and doorways. normally 6" X 4" and upto about 4M in length. if openings are larger than 4m then RSJs are normally used, depending on the load above to be supported. pic

reason i mentioned lintels is steel RSJ's have to be sat on a pad stone of some sort (building regs).
when structural steels are added, the wall that they sit on will not always be strong enough to support it on its own. the concrete padstone helps distribute the load, and normally 300mm is all that required. but it does depend on what the walls are built out of for example, thermalite block walls would maybe need a larger pad or else the weight would just smash through them and the whole thing would fall down, and concrete blocks would not need as bigger padstone if any really, but they are always put in anyway

and yes, they are mortar bedded onto these padstones that are built into the wall.

As for your comment on not using reinforced foundations in the UK for housing, i'm afraid you would be wrong, in many instances that would be the only course of achieving a stable base for a building. I know of many areas where housing estates are All built on reinforced foundations. It all very much depends on the the ground your building on!!

never seen re-inforced foundations electrically connected to the MET though, which is the point i was getting at.

So, ....Did you test these RSJ's before dismissing them, as not being extraneous??

never tested them because literally everything in the house is bonded together and it is all boarded out , would have to rip it to peices to disconnect it all to test
 
Hmmm, your just backtracking now!! If you had given all this information in the first place, there would be no confusion!!

The reinforcement in foundations isn't normally connected to the MET in TN earthing systems, not unless it's being used as a base for structural steelwork!! It's a different matter when were talking about a TT earthing system. ....So, you have never seen or heard of a Ufer means of grounding??

So why did you ask the question in the first place, if you were going to argue the ---- when you were given reasons for bonding structural steelwork?? As i stated before you didn't mention anything about isolated pad foundations in your original post, so what you received is the whens wherefore's of why structural steel is to be, or should be bonded!!

How long would it have taken to test these RSJ's when they were exposed. No need to rip the place apart just had to remove one connection and test it to find it's ohmic value. You would have known for sure then, if it was extraneous or not!!
 
it's not that i didn't give all the information, you seem to have just assumed a load of stuff that was wrong.

yeah i agree it would have been easy to test when they were exposed, but i wasn't there at that stage of the build
 
I must say that I knew exactly what EA was on about right from his OP.

In this quite normal domestic situation which we in the UK see on a daily basis, the chances of these lintels being extraneous are virtually nil and bonding to them is almost never necessary.

That's not to say that testing them at 1st fix stage by a competent electrician isn't prudent, but in this case it's likely the result of Bob the Builders overzealous interpretation of the bonding requirements. A little knowledge and all that.
 

Reply to bonding structural steel buried within fabric of building in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
303
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
818
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
884

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top