Why not for a moment put the manufacturers spec aside other than they spec a 32 amp mcb
Depending on the installation method.the 4mm may be adequate,albeit at a push and not the more usual 6.0mm or 10.0mm
So in that respect the 4.0mm could be used
The manufacturer is specifying the cable size without all the other factors that help make that decision,how they have got this information would be interesting to know
I can understand specifying minimum 6.0mm or 10.0mm to try and leave room for lower current carrying capacity of a cable
It seems odd that a manufacturer is specifying a minimum cable size that is non standard
It seems as if they have taken the worst scenario installation method for the cable that will carry the diversified load of their appliance,then plucked a cable size out of the air
In the end, the cable capacity, installation method and the mcb rating is what will govern the need,but this manufacturers priority in the wiring regs should be considered by the IET in this day and age
Depending on the installation method.the 4mm may be adequate,albeit at a push and not the more usual 6.0mm or 10.0mm
So in that respect the 4.0mm could be used
The manufacturer is specifying the cable size without all the other factors that help make that decision,how they have got this information would be interesting to know
I can understand specifying minimum 6.0mm or 10.0mm to try and leave room for lower current carrying capacity of a cable
It seems odd that a manufacturer is specifying a minimum cable size that is non standard
It seems as if they have taken the worst scenario installation method for the cable that will carry the diversified load of their appliance,then plucked a cable size out of the air
In the end, the cable capacity, installation method and the mcb rating is what will govern the need,but this manufacturers priority in the wiring regs should be considered by the IET in this day and age