View the thread, titled "Can't figure ring final r1 + r2 divided by 4" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Hi...keen amateur here......don't crucify me for asking!! I understand Ohm's law and I understand the mechanics of measuring end to end on ring final and then joining incoming live to outgoing neutral etc, and I know that this configuration gives a figure of 8 (in fact can be straightened to give a complete circle) but I can't figure out the "calculated method" of dividing by (r1+r2)/4....why?
If you meter across the mid point of the "circle" then yes...
if K= r1+r2 (the complete circle) then...since in parallel...
1/R = 1/(K/2) + 1/(K/2) which simplifies to 1/R = 4/k, then R=K/4....(r1+r2)/4........but what happens if you measure across the circle at any other point other than the mid point?
 
Hi...keen amateur here......don't crucify me for asking!! I understand Ohm's law and I understand the mechanics of measuring end to end on ring final and then joining incoming live to outgoing neutral etc, and I know that this configuration gives a figure of 8 (in fact can be straightened to give a complete circle) but I can't figure out the "calculated method" of dividing by (r1+r2)/4....why?
If you meter across the mid point of the "circle" then yes...
if K= r1+r2 (the complete circle) then...since in parallel...
1/R = 1/(K/2) + 1/(K/2) which simplifies to 1/R = 4/k, then R=K/4....(r1+r2)/4........but what happens if you measure across the circle at any other point other than the mid point?
Far to difficult for a Sunday Afternoon
 
To the furthest point or mid point 2 cables are run and the length of cable to the furthest point is half the length of cable in the ring giving a multiplier of 4 for the installed length of cable.
I just think of it as to mid points and 2 cables in parallel = multiplier of 4
 
Ring Fimal Circuits are basically two sets of conductors wired in parallel.
If you measure r1 + r2, you are in fact measuring two sets of parallel conductors, but in series.
If you had a Radial circuit 50m long and then decided to turn it into an RFC, all you would need to do is run another 50m cable from the Consumer Unit to the last socket.
So although you might use 100m end to end of cable to wire an RFC, the circuit is in fact only 50m long or only 1/2 as long.
Because an RFC is in fact two conductors in parallel, the resistance is halved another 1/2.
Multiply these two 1/2s together and you get 1/4.
Therefore when we measure r1 + r2 in an RFC, we divide by 4 to obtain R1 + R2.
 
an easy way to simplify it is to consider a length of single cable around 30m of 1.5mm
it's resistance measures at o.36 ohms. now add an identical length in parallel.resistance is halved, so 0.18 ohms

then cut both in half and parallel 2 of the 15m lengths. halved again = 0.9 ohms.
 

Reply to the thread, titled "Can't figure ring final r1 + r2 divided by 4" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Scotland
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
DIY or Homeowner (Perhaps seeking pro advice, or an electrician)

Thread Information

Title
Can't figure ring final r1 + r2 divided by 4
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
23
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
KeenPensioner,
Last reply from
KennyKen,
Replies
23
Views
32,253

Advert

Back
Top