OP
Scooby
Hmmm, jugs, with the original FIT "agreement" the financial case was a darn sight more than 'acceptable', hence the knee-jerk - with emphasis on 'jerk' - reaction by the government. If they had only kept proper tabs on what was happening on the ground, they could likely have controlled more carefully the reductions in tariff - making them smaller and more regular - thereby keeping the payback period running effectively at a pretty constant level. With no boom and bust. But, hey, that's asking them to actually be aware of what is happening.
It was always the case that they could change the FIT rates for future installs whenever it suited them. We just assumed they wouldn't be stupid about it.
Any change to the FIT rates already in place - and to the 25 year pay period - would require a change to parliamentary legislation, and the howls if that was even attempted would be quite deafening.
It was always the case that they could change the FIT rates for future installs whenever it suited them. We just assumed they wouldn't be stupid about it.
Any change to the FIT rates already in place - and to the 25 year pay period - would require a change to parliamentary legislation, and the howls if that was even attempted would be quite deafening.
Last edited by a moderator: