My understanding of the requirement for Metal CUs was to contain any fire within it.
From IET
"The non-combustible enclosure or cabinet must provide a complete envelope (for example, base, cover, door and any components such as hinges, screws and catches) as necessary to maintain fire containment. All blanks, circuit-breakers and other devices must be contained within the non combustible enclosure or cabinet.
It is important for the installer to seal all openings into the enclosure or cabinet for cables, conduits, trunking or ducting that remain after the installation of cables - see Figure 6. The intent of the sealing is to ensure that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation 421.1.201.
Good workmanship and proper materials must be used, and account must be taken of the manufacturer’s relevant instructions, if any. "
MCBs, RCBs etc manufactured to the BS -EN 60965 sect 3 Fire hazard testing, should not propagate a fire but should go out when any flame is removed. You can see in most electrical fires that all the plastic insulation has gone but the main components, whilst badly burned, are still present.
Its not inevitable that the fire will spread.
However its integrity is down to quality of workmanship. If someone doesn't believe it then perhaps they are not going to ensure it.
The IET also said
"Whilst the main cause of fire within plastic consumer unit enclosures is without doubt poor workmanship......."
So what made them think a metal CU would change anything?