Computer RFC Testing??? | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Computer RFC Testing??? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Paul.M

-
Supporter
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
10,384
Reaction score
5,809
Location
Lost in Space
I'm scratching my on this because I've never done it before. I'm on a new build school wire with quite a few computer RFC's using 2.5 T&E + a 4mm single Earth that we are just pulling in now. When it comes to us testing these circuits, how do I/we record the results?

Both the 1.5mm CPC and the 4mm Earth will be in the same terminal at each socket therefore creating a parallel path with a higher resistance if only one of them is tested, but these are going to always be like this, so do I record the combine findings or test for continuity on each of the R2's then record the R2 of each on one cert or make another page for one of the findings?

I've got it in my head that we need to do 3 lots of R2 tests and put them all on paper:-

1.5mm CPC
4mm Earth
Combined CPC + separate Earth.

Or is it just me + the QS + another very qualified spark that is having a blond moment???
 
Am I right in thinking that your 4mm is for HI earthing, if so it needs to be in a seperate terminal at each socket. I may be wrong but I was taught that you need to carry out the usual r1 + r2/r2 tests with the CPC only. Record the value of the HIEC but don't use it as part of your calculation when working out/measuring Zs.

Like I said, I may be wrong and need correcting but I remember this is the way I was taught.
 
only 1 reading is to be recorded , and as the 4mm is performing the role of cpc as well as the t&e , then take measurement of both combined would be my solution.
 
Daft Q #3 (there will be loads more!!) I thought a separate earth was only needed on the end of a radial (i.e. L&N are radial, earth is a ring) back to the CU and at each socket the in and out earth (in the t+e) should use the separate earth terminals to ensure if one drops out there will still be a path to earth?
 
Am I right in thinking that your 4mm is for HI earthing, if so it needs to be in a seperate terminal at each socket. Yes it is

I may be wrong but I was taught that you need to carry out the usual r1 + r2/r2 tests with the CPC only. Record the value of the HIEC but don't use it as part of your calculation when working out/measuring Zs. This is my dilemma, what do I put on the cert? A normal R1 + R2 (or a R2 only [accetable btw]) on the 1.5mm CPC or the 4mm Earth (not the CPC due to routing) or the combined reading of the the two?

Like I said, I may be wrong and need correcting but I remember this is the way I was taught.

Thanks mate, good in put. Makes me think more about it. Is there, or should there be more in the regs (GN3) about this?

After all, this is for a school and I'm not the type of man to cut corners. I'm going to every test and bang everything down on paper, then let the XXXXXXX city council Clerk of Works question me about it.
 
I was taught r1+r2 or r2 value recorded for CPC (1.5mm) only is to be your actual value, this being the value you would put down on the cert. The value measured on the 4mm HIEC is to be measured and recorded but not as part of the r1+r2/r2 on the certificate.

With regards to HIECs check out section 543.7.1, in particular 543.7.1.104.
 
only 1 reading is to be recorded , and as the 4mm is performing the role of cpc as well as the t&e , then take measurement of both combined would be my solution.

Thats my point Biff. Both CPC and Earth conductor will be the return path on a R1 + R2 test as well as a Zs which would be lower resistance (on the R2) than the R1 due to the combined CSA of the CPC and Earth.

To late tonight, I'll do some maths tomorrow.
 
I was taught r1+r2 or r2 value recorded for CPC (1.5mm) only is to be your actual value, this being the value you would put down on the cert. The value measured on the 4mm HIEC is to be measured and recorded but not as part of the r1+r2/r2 on the certificate.

With regards to HIECs check out section 543.7.1, in particular 543.7.1.104.

You are a star. Book reading tomorrow for me. Too late tonight. Cheers for that.
 
Thats my point Biff. Both CPC and Earth conductor will be the return path on a R1 + R2 test as well as a Zs which would be lower resistance (on the R2) than the R1 due to the combined CSA of the CPC and Earth.

To late tonight, I'll do some maths tomorrow.
CPC & earth ? i'd say CPC & CPC.
if the 4mm isnt performing the function of a cpc whats it doing ?
if it is considered as a cpc why not include it in the R2 / Zs measurement ?
 

Reply to Computer RFC Testing??? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar threads

In the 80's I was taught that with PME earthing arrangements we used 16mm for the main earthing conductor, some went a bit crazy and were bonding...
Replies
11
Views
2K
I opened up the CU again and the round junction box above and what I found was the blue and brown wires coming in from the wall just above the 15a...
2 3
Replies
33
Views
2K

Recommended Sponsor News

  • Article
thanks for the clarification. ( also thanks to Dan. ).
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Article
More info on link below http://sbsc.uk.net/
    • Like
2
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • Article
Happy Friday Everyone! Subscribe for more jokes direct to your mailbox or send us your own jokes to be in with a chance of featuring, by clicking...
    • Like
2
Replies
27
Views
6K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top