Dangers of ring final circuit | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Dangers of ring final circuit in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

Baker1988

-
Arms
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
948
Reaction score
404
Location
Kingston Upon Hull
Hi i have been set some home work from college to find out why ring final circuits are dangerous. I know the obvious that if one leg on the ring breaks it will not be a full ring and the 32 amp mcb will be too big for the cable as it will only be able to carry about 20 amps with out it been a ring which would over load the cable. But i can not find any thing other then what i already new can any one help me with this
 
Hi amp david it was my tutor at college that is what he set for home work he said they are dangerious and asked us to find out why i did not think they was dangerious as if they was why would we use them in this country where health and safety is a big part of every thing we do
 
the question should of been to find the advantages and disadvantages of a ring final circuit. The question your tutor has set is very leading, and hes tryinmg to force his opinion on you.

IMO education should be about giving you the hard facts, and knowledege for you to make your own decsions.
 
And also he may be doing it as a trick or something to try and get us to learn more about ring final circuits

I can only hope this is the case.

As you've said, the biggest risk would be if the 2.5/1.5 RFC were to 'break' and thereby become 2 radial circuits, each protected by a 32A OCPD which as we know would be above the CCC of the cable.
 
Go back to your tutor and tell him they are not exlcusive as far as danger is concerned

A ring final has the potential for danger, as do all incorrectly operating circuits and just about everything else in the electrical industry

Find some reasons why, when the design of a ring is abused, where problems can arise
Present them as potential problems for a circuit described as a ring, but not installed or operating as such
 
Yes i already know the advantages and disadvantages as i have been looking this up for the past few days and have learnt loads of stuff about rfc but could not find anything about dangers So is my tutor wrong? are they not dangerious? Is this his personal appinion
 
Yes it is. A cable is dangerous if its damaged, but we still dont label them as such. Any circuit installed incorrectly can become dangerous.The one thing all circuits ahve in common is that one of three things are required for them to become dangerous.

Intervention
damage,
or natural degradation
 
Hi amp david it was my tutor at college that is what he set for home work he said they are dangerious and asked us to find out why i did not think they was dangerious as if they was why would we use them in this country where health and safety is a big part of every thing we do

The only thing ''Dangerous'' here is Yet another numpty so-called lecturer that's perpetuating his ''OWN'' personal misguided views and prejudices onto his students. All this does, is burden these students with the myths and scaremongery we see all the time, in newly trained or trainee's in the posts they write .... I suppose this same lecturer tells you that you can't use the armour of SWA cable as your CPC too, or you Can't extend a PME earthing system from the house to a garage or shed....

And we wonder why these students are leaving collage/training centre's, with little or no idea of circuit design. Makes you wonder if it's these lecturers that are in dire need annual assessment, on their competency to teach, ...Just like the majority of the Part Pee electricians that were taught by these numbties....
 
so are you saying that the original point made by baker1988 is not correct?
ie. a break in the ring will not be detected by the user so the ring could be operating beyond the cable capability. In this respect it could be considered more dangerous than a radial could it not?

Just trying to understand the situation myself....
 
so are you saying that the original point made by baker1988 is not correct?
ie. a break in the ring will not be detected by the user so the ring could be operating beyond the cable capability. In this respect it could be considered more dangerous than a radial could it not?

Just trying to understand the situation myself....

As I said in post #7, that is the biggest risk of an RFC, as the householder would not be aware of it so the cable may if heavily loaded, be operating outside of it's capacity.
 

Reply to Dangers of ring final circuit in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
299
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
807
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
851

Similar threads

Yep! Edit button was disabled by the time I seen it. Hopefully the 15m/15m clarified what I intended 😀
2 3
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Question
CONCLUSION (Couldn't see how to edit title) It was not belting it down with rain today, so lifted the manhole cover. The pump is about 2 metres...
2 3 4
Replies
45
Views
6K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top