Different Testing Courses

[Engineer54]

NOOOO!!! ENG IS ALWAYS RIGHT! ENG IS NEVER WRONG! ANYONE THAT DISAGREES WITH ENG IS STUPID!".
not just me that thinks this way then.

Well as far as you are concerned, i'd be spot on every time then!! lol!!

 

[Engineer54]

Bo$$ox to it....bring back the 'C cert' , that'll sort 'em all out.

Exactly my thoughts!! lol!

 

[Engineer54]

=D Skelton;911373]I'm done, there's no educating some people! Lol.

As much as me and Eng get into heated squabbles we still love each other really

Eng, I will make this point and only this:

I do understand your cynicism when it comes to new qualifications, I truly do! In fact, there isn't much that we fundamentally disagree on regarding this matter, however, maybe it is best to reserve your prejudice and snide comments about the 2394/2395 in particular until you have actually sat them, or, you have heard from a significant amount of people who disagree with my experience. As it stands, more people agree with me than they do you on this matter, and until the opposite is true, I will continue to defend an equally meaningful replacement qualification to the 2391!

Do I think one is better than the other? No. The 2391 was certainly better value for money! But cost aside, I cannot see any reason why the new T&I quals are any easier to pass than the old.

I did say that i could be swayed/convinced if a few others come in and confirm your assessment of the new 2394/5, if that's what you mean by educating?? lol!!

Couldn't see what all the fuss was about anyway, for the most part, when i did make a comment on the new qualification course, it was mainly ''Supposedly equal to 2391'' is that such a bad remark to make on my part, in as far as i'm not convinced?? Can't remember ever ''Shedding'' the thing....

Anyway i hope that's an end to it for now!!