Ok mate
your the man, I'll buy a torque screwdriver immediately for fear of what damage I will do with my screwdrivers.
- Thread starter Steady Steve
- Start date
your the man, I'll buy a torque screwdriver immediately for fear of what damage I will do with my screwdrivers.There are a couple of topics that seem to get more of a "conversation" here than any normal person would imagine is sane. Radial versus RFC is one, and torque screwdrivers another!
My own view is they make sense: partly for legal posterior-covering, and partly as I don't do enough work of this sort to get a feel for what is right over a large range of terminal settings. Historically it has been the small stuff I have done (13A terminals, DIN rail for 2.5mm/4mm size, etc) which is not too hard to learn what is sane and within a reasonable range, but for some MCB/RCD and so on the screwdriver torque is higher than I would every try. Part of that is for mechanical work I would not use a screwdriver bit at all as it feels so close to caming out, but I would use either an Allen screw, Torx, or hex nut for those sort of forces.
Now the experienced sparks on here have done an apprenticeship or similar, and spent a lifetime doing a good job so I get why they might feel put out by new guidance to do things differently or, more to the point, to spent £100 or so on something they have not needed for most of their career.
My own view is they make sense: partly for legal posterior-covering, and partly as I don't do enough work of this sort to get a feel for what is right over a large range of terminal settings. Historically it has been the small stuff I have done (13A terminals, DIN rail for 2.5mm/4mm size, etc) which is not too hard to learn what is sane and within a reasonable range, but for some MCB/RCD and so on the screwdriver torque is higher than I would every try. Part of that is for mechanical work I would not use a screwdriver bit at all as it feels so close to caming out, but I would use either an Allen screw, Torx, or hex nut for those sort of forces.
Now the experienced sparks on here have done an apprenticeship or similar, and spent a lifetime doing a good job so I get why they might feel put out by new guidance to do things differently or, more to the point, to spent £100 or so on something they have not needed for most of their career.
- So do I think experienced sparks need a torque screwdriver? Not really, but possibly for posterior-covering.
- Do I need one? Definitely, as I occasionally do stuff that must be right (high current MCB, tails and similar SWA fixing terminals) and lack the practice to get it right every time.
- Should a student get one? Eventually when they start doing CU or similar work that merits it.
P
PEG
I apologise for my buckshot punctuation
A while ago,i was knocked unconcious,when my torque device slipped off a fastener,and i may still be recovering after coming out of a deep comma
Unlike many years ago on most modern vehicles you find quite a lot of bolts are stretch bolts that are torqued to a set limit and are finished with an angular torque value
Steady Steve
Trainee
Yes, I'd be interested in your +/- thanks. If you still have them you'll have to let me know how we provide details to meet up. Appreciated
Certainly for the most critical ones for cylinder head, etc.
While using a torque wrench to get predictable forces is better than nothing it is not really that accurate. The wrench might be something like +/-3% in terms of torque applied, but that variability of friction on the threads and surface of the fasteners can make the resulting preload up to +/-30% variability.
With angle-tightening you take up the free play and then use the geometry of the thread to stretch/compress by a certain length which relates to the desired preload, though I believe it really only works well on long (w.r.t diameter) fasteners (like cylinder head studs, etc).
The 'feel' of tightening is another method that has been automated to get better results than torque, etc. For anyone who is interested here is a brief guide:
Rubbish. Possessing a torque driver shows no more compliance or competence to anything! Do you also think that owning a wardrobe of fancy clothes makes you more able to pull a model in a bar? Around my part of the world the local old-boys have a saying when a 'DFL' (Down From London) buys a house and jumps on the bandwagon of pretending to be a countryman - "All the gear and no idea", it's exactly the same with this.
Now, I've been NICEIC (and BSi before) inspected more times than I can remember and I have NEVER been asked to prove my competence by the contents of my tool box. Yes, MI's are to be followed and only practical way of doing that is with the right tool for the job - I'll give you that - but that's where the conversation ends! There are also hundreds of thousands of electrical items sold for installation in the UK where the flimsy instructions simply say to check all terminals for tightness and there are millions of consumer units perfectly safely installed years ago before this was even a thing. Do I own one? Yes, I do. Do I use it on every terminal I tighten, having scoured the web for downloads of MI recommended values?.......
I learned a saying when I was an apprentice from my old chief (who'd previously in HIS younger years assembled half the overhead grids in the South West) - "when it's white, it's tight" - referring to the fact that your knuckles go pale under proper stress.
I live in Scotland. My whole hand is white, never mind my knuckles.
Sometimes goes pale blue when its a bit nippy... (you know, when we need to put a coat on)
Sometimes goes pale blue when its a bit nippy... (you know, when we need to put a coat on)
will do . i'll have a look later today.
Nah Im an ugly old bugger, but I do reckon I'd have more chance of not being arrested for harassment if I wore clothes than if I tried to pull her and I was starkas..
Really? First thing my assessor wanted to see is my approved voltage tester and lock off kit for safe isolation and the certificate to prove my MFT had been certified in the last year... I don't think they would have said I was competent if I didnt have an approved voltage tester and MFT (Of other testing devices to do the full range of tests)
Don't disagree with you one bit, why do you think they put on their check all the terminals for tightness? Surely they the manufacturer can do up a terminal to the correct tightness? Its to shift the blame if in the unlikely chance something were to go wrong.. That is my who point, not having a torque screwdriver and not following instructions opens you up to being instantly put at blame.. Its like if your drunk while driving and some silly bugger pulls out right in front of you.. Even though it might be their fault for pulling out, it will be yours because your drunk..
Yep thats pretty good, and I can understand people who might have been doing it for years don't see the point, I am sure when MFT and more rigorous testing came in there was some electricians back in the day saying why do I need to spend all this money on a testing device, I know what I am doing, I dont make mistakes.
They put the torque setting on a sticker inside the CU usually. It must be there for a reason.
Not hidden away in the paperwork somewhere.
They may need to change the “ensure all connections are tight” label to something that mentions torque… that might bring more people into using them.
The only people that should be inside a CU are electricians, and if they all have a torque driver, then there will be no excuse for too loose or too tight connections.
Can it become a “service” like vehicles where we check that terminations are still torqued to the correct value… and CU’s sealed like a meter to detect tampering?
Random thoughts for a Friday night
Not hidden away in the paperwork somewhere.
They may need to change the “ensure all connections are tight” label to something that mentions torque… that might bring more people into using them.
The only people that should be inside a CU are electricians, and if they all have a torque driver, then there will be no excuse for too loose or too tight connections.
Can it become a “service” like vehicles where we check that terminations are still torqued to the correct value… and CU’s sealed like a meter to detect tampering?
Random thoughts for a Friday night
D
Dustydazzler
Which then begs the question , Do you re-torque every 5 or 10 years when doing the Eicr or once torqued up initially is that good enough for the life of the unit ?
It would have to be checked frequently, as we all know, screw terminals can loosen simply with high load cycling as well as physical vibration.
Just trying to drum up some business for us guys
D
Dustydazzler
Re-torque annually ?
Bi-annually.
Every 6 months, with a calibrated torque driver.
Just the CU terminations. More paperwork, with a list of every screw…. Serial numbers,
Optimum settings….
Most CUs start falling apart after taking the cover screws off twice, never mind for the lifetime of the equipment.
D
Dustydazzler
How would you disconnect to do periodic testing ?
LewisM
-
I was only messing would never work as you say for testing etc and knowing my luck I'd put the wrong cable In the wrong breaker then it would be too late
Always makes me smile when the comments turn to the whole family died in a fire caused by not conforming to ....................whatever, if the family died I would think the house was a right off and the consumer unit and electric circuits/cables destroyed along with the house, how is anyone going to know if anything conformed or was complied with prior to the fire or who is too blame, fire investigations officer's can only go so far, and I don't think they are clairvoyant.
How dare you Micheal. They all died because I didn't have a torque screwdriver
I humbly apologise and vow to throw myself on my sword the next time it leaves its scabbard, I have to warn you though that the last time I tried I missed.
Last edited:
Most of the boxer air cooled engines have very long studs from the crankcase through the cylinders and cylinder heads, the ones I have torqued had very necked areas in their length, designed to stretch at a set torque and pre-tention the cylinders and heads to each other.
Wow that brings back memories it was over forty years ago.
Fire Service have an alternative cause for "Don't Know". it's called "electrical fault".
D
Dustydazzler
In the old days when loads of people smoked , most house fires seemed to be put down to someone falling a sleep with a lighted smoke in their hand...
Now it seems to be because the electrician didn't use a torque wrench
Now it seems to be because the electrician didn't use a torque wrench
P
PEG
Might i recommend that all the terminals that require a specific torque,be replaced by either a crimp,or soldering.....because we never have any fallings out,over those methods 
I'm surprised that spring-loaded arrangements like the Wagos have not made it to CUs yet. Would avoid a lot of these issues by design!Might i recommend that all the terminals that require a specific torque,be replaced by either a crimp,or soldering.....because we never have any fallings out,over those methods
OFFICIAL SPONSORS
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
Advert
Thread starter
- Joined
- Location
- Northwich
- If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
- United Kingdom
- What type of forum member are you?
- Trainee Electrician
- Business Name
- Starswork
Thread Information
Thread Tags
Advert
Thread statistics
Advert
TrueNAS JBOD Storage Server
-
-
Understanding TrueNAS JBOD Servers: A Comprehensive Guide- Started by Dan
- Replies: 8
-
