Does an RCBo or RCD cover the requirements | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Does an RCBo or RCD cover the requirements in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

B

blurt

When testing a circuit on a consumer unit up-grade and the Zs is higher than the maximum pemissible value does protecting the circuit with a RCD/RCBo meet the requirements of the 0.4 seconds or should the Zs still meet the automatic dissconnection of supply.
 
Yes if the maximum Zs values for a circuit in a TN system cannot be met, the circuit may be protected by a 30ma RCD. 531.3.1
 
rcd's and rcbo's work on earth faults, so if you have a short circuit or overload type fault in the circuit it may not disconnect in time. so not really no is your answer.
 
rcd's and rcbo's work on earth faults, so if you have a short circuit or overload type fault in the circuit it may not disconnect in time. so not really no is your answer.

an over load fault rely on the breaker tripping on overload and normally if a fault develops between L-N / L-E it will blow quickly as the fault current will be great!
an RCD earth faullt uses the imbalance of a field and coil to detect leakege to earth!!
 
an over load fault rely on the breaker tripping on overload and normally if a fault develops between L-N / L-E it will blow quickly as the fault current will be great!
an RCD earth faullt uses the imbalance of a field and coil to detect leakege to earth!!

On a circuit with a high Zs a L-E fault current will be lower will it not? ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a circuit with a high Zs a L-E fault current will be lower will it not? ;)

Indeed it will, hence the need for a maximum Zs, to achieve the required fault current in the event of a fault of neglible impedance. With a high Zs, the chances are you have a high line-neutral loop impedance too.

I do have problems with the idea of "Zs is high, so we'll stick an RCD on it", as it smacks of bad design in the first place...
 
As regards overload and short circuit current the requirments are deemed to be met by any of the protective devices permitted by Bs7671....there is a regulation but I cant remember where...


Found ....433.1.2...433.1.3.....435.1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TT systems are a worst case scenario, as you cannot get a low Zs so have to resort to using residual current devices for earth fault protection.

But in a TN system, there should really be no need unless the design is rubbish...

I wouldnt disagree....if a new install it would not be acceptable if the measured Zs exceeded the max value of the protective device chosen at the design stage. But most of these slightly high Zs issues crop up on existing/old circuits being altered or extended,which are none the less perfectly safe ,and IMO using an RCD to meet the disconnection time is perfectly acceptable.
 
On a circuit with a high Zs a L-E fault current will be lower will it not? ;)

Indeed it will, hence the need for a maximum Zs, to achieve the required fault current in the event of a fault of neglible impedance.

Wasn't really a question, more of an observation that DurhamSparky said a L-E fault would blow the OCPD quickly as the fault current would be great. This isn't completely true on a circuit with a high Zs as the fault current would be lower, hence the reliance on an RCD.
 

Reply to Does an RCBo or RCD cover the requirements in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
285
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
789
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
810

Similar threads

As per above from Dave. Swap to a 63A outlet and problem goes away. What gets plugged into it is not part of an inspection.
Replies
20
Views
2K
Duh!!! Just re-read Op's original post, it was converted to a RFC!
Replies
12
Views
684

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top