Does this setup contravene any regs or is it ok? | Page 12 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Does this setup contravene any regs or is it ok? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

I presume you are talking about my posts. I am not shouting. I have explained my argument numerous times to the point of being immensely frustrated.

My argument has never been about whether lumping circuits together is safe; indeed I have admitted that I have done it, albeit for a temporary stop gap solution. It may well be electrically safe and in which case it can be done (temporarily).

If it is done as a new install it should be highlighted in the EIC as a non compliance and explained as to why it was done, along the lines of a justification. (By the way, the excuse of ‘I needed another spare way because I didn’t buy a big enough CU, and don’t think that the two I have looks to be enough for possibly future expansion’ is not a justification in my view).

If it is found during an EICR it should be highlighted as a C3 or a C2 if it proposes an electrical risk.

How much clearer can I be?

If you guys still don’t agree now then I can only assume that you have been practicing this. I haven’t so I’m not bothered by it.

I will now bow out! Live long and prosper!
I fail to see why it poses an Electrical risk? Could you eleaborate on why?
 
Not my definition, and no, neither of those items.
A toaster perhaps, or a kettle.

So a toaster is a circuit but not an electric razor. I really don't get this definition of circuit you are using.
 
It's an appliance. It is current using equipment. Just like a table lamp or a fridge freezer, or anything that plugs into a 13A socket. It is NOT a circuit.
 
It's an appliance. It is current using equipment. Just like a table lamp or a fridge freezer, or anything that plugs into a 13A socket. It is NOT a circuit.
I’m glad that we have established that something that satisfies a definition in BS7671 is not necessarily the thing being defined.
So does this mean you are stating 2 circuits connected to the same MCB are 2 circuits or 1?
 
At risk of adding to the fire, App 15 Fig 15A in BBB states that "an infused spur may be connected to the origin of the circuit in the distribution board". Which to me says the origin of circuits is the distribution board (no toasters need apply, sorry) and a circuit may branch from within the board.
 

Reply to Does this setup contravene any regs or is it ok? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
388
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
970
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Locked
Thread closed.
2
Replies
19
Views
899
It does seem to me that there's a capacitively coupled voltage to each set of downlights (on the light side of the switch), and when you put the...
Replies
6
Views
301

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top