Earth rings on SWA cables | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Earth rings on SWA cables in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

So you are happy leaving metal work that is carrying cables not to be bonded back to the MET?

Explain how that is dangerous and not a safety connection then please?
Dillb mate

Yes i am happy leaving metal work that is neither extraneous or exposed conductive parts unbonded/earthed. just like when i have put up double insulated metal fittings, with BS and the double square markings i have not decided to earth them to be on the safe side

heres why
Exposed-conductive-part.Conductive part of equipment which can be touched and which is not normallylive, but which can become live under fault conditions.
Extraneous-conductive-part. Aconductive part liable to introduce a potential, generally Earth potential, andnot forming part of the electrical installation
A cable tray or a cable basketwhere used as a support and cable management system has to be considered in thecontext of earthing and bonding. In other words, are such systems, whereconsisting of metal and plastic-coated metal, exposed-conductive-parts orextraneous-conductive-parts and consequently do they require earthing orbonding?
Addressing, first, the questionof earthing and whether the cable tray or basket should be earthed, electricalequipment such as cables mounted on a metallic support system will normally beequivalent to either a Class I construction (for example copper sheathed,mineral insulated cables without an overall PVC covering) or a Class IIequivalent construction (for example PVC insulated and sheathed cable).
Exposed-conductive-parts ofcables, such as the copper sheath of a mineral insulated cable, are required tobe connected to the MET of the installation by a CPC designed to conduct earthfault currents. The cable tray or basket which the mineral insulated cable isattached to, or may be in contact with, is not itself anexposed-conductive-part and therefore it does not require earthing. To do sowould only serve to distribute further any touch voltage resulting from anearth fault on an item of equipment to which the cable is connected.
A cable complying with theappropriate standard having a non-metallic sheath or a non- metallic enclosureis deemed to provide satisfactory protection against both direct and indirectcontact, as does an item of Class II equipment (Regulation 471-09-04 refers).Class II equipment is constructed such that any insulation fault in the cablecannot result in a fault current flowing into any conductive parts with whichthe equipment may be in contact. Hence, the metal cable tray or basket need notbe earthed

 
Well at least post the whole article and not just the parts you want too.
A cable tray or a cable basket where used as a support and cable management system has to be considered in the context of earthing and bonding. In other words, are such systems where consisting of metal and plastic-coated metal, exposed-conductive-parts or extraneous-conductive-parts and consequently do they require earthing or bonding?

Addressing first, the question of earthing and whether the cable tray or basket should be earthed, electrical equipment such as cables mounted on a metallic support system will normally be equivalent either a Class l construction (for example copper sheathed, mineral insulated cables without an overall PVC covering) or a Class ll equivalent construction (for example PVC insulated and sheathed cable).

Exposed-conductive-parts of cables, such as the copper sheath of a mineral insulated cable are required to be connected to the MET of the installation by a CPC designed to conduct earth fault currents. The cable tray or basket which the mineral insulated cable is attached to, or may be in contact with, is not itself an exposed-conductive-part and therefore it does not require earthing. To do so would only serve to distribute further any touch voltage resulting from an earth fault on an item of equipment to which the cable is connected.

A cable complying with the appropriate standard having a non-metallic sheath or a non-metallic enclosure is deemed to provide satisfactory protection against both direct and indirect contact, as does an item of Class ll equipment (Regulation 471-09-04 refers). Class ll equipment is constructed such that any insulation fault in the cable cannot result in a fault current flowing into any conductive parts with which the equipment may be in contact. Hence, the cable tray or basket need not be earthed.

Generally, the conductive parts of a metal cable tray or basket system need not be puropsely earthed. Some conductive parts of a metal cable support system may be earthed, however, by virtue of fortuitous contact with exposed-conductive-parts.

Should the cable tray or basket be equipotentially bonded? Unless the metal cable support system introduces a potential that does not already exist in the location which the system is installed, it will not meet the definition of an extraneous-conductive-part. In normal circumstances therefore there is no need to arrange for the conductive parts of the support system to be connected to either a main bonding conductor or any supplementary bonding conductor.

However, should the cable tray be installed in such a manner that it is lekely to introduce a potential from outside the location, thereby meeting the definition of an extraneous-conductive-part, then main equipotential bonding will be required (Regulatiuon 413-02-02 refers). For example, consider a run of cable tray carrying services into a particular building. The cable tray may be in contact with the earth potential ouside a building and upon entering into the building would be likely to introduce the earth potential into that building. In such a case the tray would warrant the defintion of an extraneous-conductive-part and consequently main equipotenial bonding would be required.

Where, for example, the installation designer has selected a cable tray for use as a protective conductor, which is permitted under Regulation 543-02-02(vi) where it is described as an electrically continous support systerm for conductors, the cable tray would be required to meet the requirements for a protective conductor given in Regulation 543-02-04 and would need to be connected with earth.
 
However, should the cable tray be installed in such a manner that it is lekely to introduce a potential from outside the location, thereby meeting the definition of an extraneous-conductive-part, then main equipotential bonding will be required (Regulatiuon 413-02-02 refers). For example, consider a run of cable tray carrying services into a particular building. The cable tray may be in contact with the earth potential ouside a building and upon entering into the building would be likely to introduce the earth potential into that building. In such a case the tray would warrant the defintion of an extraneous-conductive-part and consequently main equipotenial bonding would be required.

as i said if it was classed as an extraneous conductive part it would require bonding. if it is not then no bonding required
 
Dillb mate

Yes i am happy leaving metal work that is neither extraneous or exposed conductive parts unbonded/earthed. just like when i have put up double insulated metal fittings, with BS and the double square markings i have not decided to earth them to be on the safe side

heres why
Exposed-conductive-part.Conductive part of equipment which can be touched and which is not normallylive, but which can become live under fault conditions.
Extraneous-conductive-part. Aconductive part liable to introduce a potential, generally Earth potential, andnot forming part of the electrical installation
A cable tray or a cable basketwhere used as a support and cable management system has to be considered in thecontext of earthing and bonding. In other words, are such systems, whereconsisting of metal and plastic-coated metal, exposed-conductive-parts orextraneous-conductive-parts and consequently do they require earthing orbonding?
Addressing, first, the questionof earthing and whether the cable tray or basket should be earthed, electricalequipment such as cables mounted on a metallic support system will normally beequivalent to either a Class I construction (for example copper sheathed,mineral insulated cables without an overall PVC covering) or a Class IIequivalent construction (for example PVC insulated and sheathed cable).
Exposed-conductive-parts ofcables, such as the copper sheath of a mineral insulated cable, are required tobe connected to the MET of the installation by a CPC designed to conduct earthfault currents. The cable tray or basket which the mineral insulated cable isattached to, or may be in contact with, is not itself anexposed-conductive-part and therefore it does not require earthing. To do sowould only serve to distribute further any touch voltage resulting from anearth fault on an item of equipment to which the cable is connected.
A cable complying with theappropriate standard having a non-metallic sheath or a non- metallic enclosureis deemed to provide satisfactory protection against both direct and indirectcontact, as does an item of Class II equipment (Regulation 471-09-04 refers).Class II equipment is constructed such that any insulation fault in the cablecannot result in a fault current flowing into any conductive parts with whichthe equipment may be in contact. Hence, the metal cable tray or basket need notbe earthed


as above
 
I always thought that tray should be bonded, I Remember doing my AM2 and having to bond the tray, basket, especially with T+E could become live with snagged cable etc, however it is usually connected to earth via the main frame of the building anyways.

With regards to the article above, it mentions tray being used as a protective conductor, I have always thoght this was not allowed?
 
I always thought that tray should be bonded, I Remember doing my AM2 and having to bond the tray, basket, especially with T+E could become live with snagged cable etc, however it is usually connected to earth via the main frame of the building anyways.

With regards to the article above, it mentions tray being used as a protective conductor, I have always thoght this was not allowed?

When i sat my fica we got told to supplementry bond the tray too, were told dont ask questions just do it
 
Your dead right, best not to rock the boat when being tested! I don't know the right or wrong of this one im afraid, your presenting me with logical reasons but something just tells me it should be bonded!

we were told dont question it dont leave it or you will loose points
At the end of the say its up to us as installers to decide . I just read as much as i can fit in, to try an gain knowledge as to why to do it or why not. some people still say bond sinks or metallic furniture in kitchens ect ect cos its what they have done for donkeys and they will continue to do so i suppose
 
... some people still say bond sinks or metallic furniture in kitchens ect ect cos its what they have done for donkeys and they will continue to do so i suppose

Then those people dont understand why they are doing something , or what constitutes an extraneous conductive part.
 
I can see a tray load of SWA's or MICC wouldnt need bonding unless it met the definitions of an ECP, however if it was a basket full of twins I would be tempted to, however most of the trays/baskets I have seen pick up very good connections to earth through purlings/ RSJ's etc. Whether they then need bonding is doubtful I suppose, as they are reliably connected to earth.
I have been on jobs as part of the 'earthing squad' though and have had to bond acroos every piece of racking and framework with 70mm links though, however different systems are in place on these jobs and they are often not to BS7671
 

Reply to Earth rings on SWA cables in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
265
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
756
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
745

Similar threads

I assume said contractor is part of a Part P scheme (NICEIC, Napit, few others..) in which case complain to them. They'll investigate (in theory)...
Replies
10
Views
883
  • Question
All the lamp post cutouts I've ever seen have a twin swa gland plate built in to the base.
Replies
2
Views
632
loz2754
L

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top