EICR Main Switch/circuit breaker | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss EICR Main Switch/circuit breaker in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

If there is a minor recommendation for safety that will cost a customer significant sums to address for minimal gain I feel this is counter productive and not a professional approach. Having someone aware of an issue that could be addressed at a time something else is being changed is good, forcing someone to immediately and without fail to install a single main switch for close grouped boards is not good.
appreciate your feedback
 
There was a section on the single point of isolation recently in the mag we get from napit, it's page 32 in issue #1 2017 for anybody that hasn't binned it yet.

Their view is that although yes it is good practice to have an isolator at the origin it is NOT required by BS7671 and so no code is required.
How have they explained side tracking Reg 537.1.4
 
If I were doing the EICR for an insurance company, who have less than intelligent conditions of addressing all C3s, then it would be no code as the switches are all in close proximity, if it were being done privately then C3 on the schedule of inspections as this would be a recommended improvement for safety. N/A on the installation details and each individual main switch identified in the schedule of test results.
So you apply if the installation complies with BS7671 Amd 3 depending who you are doing the EICR for ?.C3 is improvement recommended/does not comply with the latest regs
 
on the napit forms there's an option to just add items as a "note" if they aren't due a classification code so that is what I do when installations are like this, which is seems is the right thing to do afterall
 
So you apply if the installation complies with BS7671 Amd 3 depending who you are doing the EICR for ?.C3 is improvement recommended/does not comply with the latest regs
C3 is for a non compliance with BS7617 that may give rise to danger and so improvement is recommended but it is not a situation of immediate danger or where a fault may cause danger.
Where I am aware that an inappropriate level of importance will be assigned to my professional observation that a low level of danger may arise, then I will modify my report to ensure that it is not misinterpreted by uninformed persons.
 
All of the regulations exist for the purpose of ensuring a safe installation.

An EICR should not be tailored to suit who will be reading it. If an improvement for safety can be recommended then it should be recommended to everyone, not just the people who are more likely to ignore it. If an insurance company is going to insist on having every recommendation for improvement acted upon them that is a good thing, it is the ideal situation that every possible safety improvement is insisted on.

The requirement for a single main switch has been in the regulations in various forms since the first edition so there is no way it can be argued that it complied at the time of installation without one. The purpose of a single main switch is to allow the simple and total isolation of the entire installation in any situation when it is necessary, especially in emergency situations.
Its easy enough to identify multiple points of isolation in normal conditions, but in an emergency situation the tendency towards panic takes over and makes everything a lot more difficult.
 
Along with your scheme technical helpline does anyone use the IET tech line?
I have done once and they had different advice from the NICEIC helpline.
 

Reply to EICR Main Switch/circuit breaker in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
288
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
791
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
814

Similar threads

As the cable itself has had the cpc cut off at both ends I would enter a C3 as it doesn't offer any protection within the cable if accidentally...
Replies
3
Views
253
If it's going to be an emergency stop and not just a stop, then other factors come into play depending on what sort of machines the emergency stop...
Replies
11
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top