EICR thoroughness. | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss EICR thoroughness. in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

dlt27

-
Joined
Jul 4, 2011
Messages
196
Reaction score
30
I have been doing An EICR report today with another electrician from my workplace. He has tested double the amount of circuits I have. Now I follow testing to the book however he basically said that he:
1 calculates R1+R2 and just measures zs as he says as long as it is ok what does it matter if there are parallel paths. After all zs test is as it is when the circuit is live. Also says half the time can't disconnect parallel paths anyway.
2 Doesn't megger test between n-e as he says worst that can happen is circuit will trip when there is a low reading if on an rcbo. Says there isn't a danger if there is a low reading between n-e. Sometimes doesn't do l-e either as he says worse case scenario is it will just trip anyway.
Just wondered if somebody could give me some hard factual stuff I could throw back at him for not carrying out these tests.. Also truthfully how far does everybody else go when testing.
My NAPIT inspector even said to me he does end to ends at socket and doesn't do insulation resistance test because I said how does he do insulation resistance test without disconnecting the neutral at db.
Thanks for any reasons for carrying out testing properly.
 
Apologies if that post came across the wrong way.
Well, low IR means failed/failing/damaged insulation. Now I would say the insulation is a fairly critical part of a cable. Daz
 
I understand that but are you saying the implications are risk of electric shock and arcing. Because won't the protective device just trip eventually.
I have always carried out testing to the book as I always think knowing my luck I'll be the 1 in a million standing up in front of the judge. Thanks for reply.
 
I agree with all.
However why is low insulation resistance reading a code 2. What are the dangers associated with a low reading, or what can it cause apart from nuisance tripping?
Thanks for replies. Oh and yes he takes ze from zs for r1+r2.

Not sure I understand your reply, could you explain a little bit more please
 
I agree with all.
However why is low insulation resistance reading a code 2. What are the dangers associated with a low reading, or what can it cause apart from nuisance tripping?
Thanks for replies. Oh and yes he takes ze from zs for r1+r2.

I think you're looking for a very exact 'this is what will happen due to a inadequate IR'. I'm not sure if thats possible. It's a bit like saying 'what will happen if I get out of my vehicle on a safari'? Maybe nothing, maybe you get eaten.

A pretty poor example but all I can think of.

Put simply the standard of the insulation is obviously very important. If we are just going to rely on the RCD then we may as well not bother with any IR checks at all and just wrap it in plastic bags!

A poor IR test shows that the insulation may be failing, again if we just say that doesn't really matter as there is an RCD then I think we are missing an important point, and one that I dont think I can explain clearly in words as it should just be generic.
 
There are two aspects to a low IR.

One is that it can present an immediate hazard of electric shock, if something is live that shouldn't be, or fire if the failed insulation has started to char and go into runaway heating.

The other is that it is a tell-tale for all sorts of problems. Investigating the cause of low IR sometimes leads you to something nasty that you hadn't otherwise spotted - a joint box full of water, a cable with half its insulation chewed off by mice, an overheated motor...

But I agree with the sentiment above, it's so fundamental I find it interesting that one would challenge the importance of insulation. It's like a gasfitter saying it doesn't matter if you have leaky gas pipes so long as there's nothing nearby to create a spark.
 
One of the main reasons to record IR values from initial installation is to monitor them over periods of time, and why ongoing periodic inspection and testing of installations are a worthwhile exercise. They can, when and if regularly tested, clearly identify the deterioration of a circuits insulation before any catastrophic breakdown occurs.....
 

Reply to EICR thoroughness. in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
319
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
844
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
967

Similar threads

Continuity of the suspect cable appears fine all cores, from this I could work out the length of it and it really doesn’t appear looking at the...
Replies
2
Views
333
  • Question
I would add though that a typical good TT rod of 100 ohms only needs 3V to have 30mA flowing and so trip an RCD, you might find that sort of N-E...
Replies
8
Views
690

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top