Extraneous Conductive Parts in Bathroom | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Extraneous Conductive Parts in Bathroom in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Megger 1730, realise not the most suitable device to use for this measurement, but it's never been that much of an issue before. Normally such readings of 'non' extraneous conductive parts, have been several Mohms.
 
Only skim read this but is the resolution of your MFT not much better on continuity setting rather than IR settings. Think my 1553 measures up to 99k ohms on continuity.

Might be wrong though - it is friday evening!
 
Hmmmmm, my 1730 spec shows Continuity/Resistance ranges; 0.01 - 99.9 ohms + 100 - 99.9kohms. As far as I can see, my maximum reading on my Continuity setting is 99.9omhs. Anyhows, a reading of 99.9kohms would convert to 0.0999mohms, so we're in the same boat, as regards the limitation of this device, to accurately read 22000ohms.
 
The 1730 appears to be autoranging on resistance and on the higher range with a max reading of 99.9kΩ it reads in increments of 100Ω +/- 2 counts. At 22kΩ it would display somewhere between 19.8 and 22.2 which is fine for your purposes. A separate discussion is the relative merits of different test voltages for this test.
 
The 1730 appears to be autoranging on resistance and on the higher range with a max reading of 99.9kΩ it reads in increments of 100Ω +/- 2 counts. At 22kΩ it would display somewhere between 19.8 and 22.2 which is fine for your purposes. A separate discussion is the relative merits of different test voltages for this test.

This is correct, and the same for the Megger MIT range with kΩ range.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I am wondering however in this scenario, why when using my 1730 set to continuity I obtain a reading of >999ohms (i.e. I don't get kohm reading), but when set to IR a reading of 0.01mohm?

Apologies as this has turned into a thread on how to use my own MFT!
 
Thanks chaps, just worked it out myself. Appears range on continuity on the 1730, can be set to maximums, mine was set to 999ohms. I'll try out my new settings, on those pesky pipes.
 
Results are in.

Went back today, and was able cross bond hot water & cold water services under sink. (can't see if I said, but previously bonded cold water and still had reading of 5.6k ohms on me pipework). Re tested said pipe work to local cpc, and obtained reading of 0.54 ohms. Sorted.
 

Reply to Extraneous Conductive Parts in Bathroom in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
591
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
949

Similar threads

If you can see a piece of plastic entering from the ground then (as cliff said), it does not need main bonding. I think (not sure) this is reg...
Replies
3
Views
444
Hi I need help with understand supplementary bonding. I know RCD is additional protection and in the even of the fault at leakage of 30mA, it...
Replies
0
Views
101

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top