To be honest I think the reg is a half reasonable attempt to solve the relatively simple issue of dealing with surface mounted wiring, which could possibly have been secured with nothing more than the double sided tape on the back of the trunking, prior to this.
On the other hand I take issue with a number of Malcolms points.
His definition of premature collapse as being any failure prior to intentional destruction by way of demolition is clearly absurd.
He also states that use of water to extinguish a fire on upper floors may give rise to the plasterboard ceilling below falling through, therefore allowing wiring to collapse. I am unsure of his argument here. If the plasterboard had survived the fire prior to impact of firefighting water, or was never exposed to fire, then the use of metal clips is irrelevant, and plastic clips would be just as effective in supporting the wiring in this situation.
As for statements that plasterboard isn't fire proof, just fire resistant, but we should use metal fire proof clips...I ask this. Why is it that steel structural members require protection from fire, and why is it that this protection is often delivered by means of plasterboard cladding?