Formal Visual - Pass Sticker?

[Grizzly01]

What I'm saying is I don't think there should be two separate tests - you do the testing and put a test sticker on, then the user should do a visual (or rather 'all senses except taste' inspection) before they use it, without having to put any more stickers on the appliance.

How come you're going around doing visual-only inspections?

But what you've overlooked it that there are 3 levels to this, not 2:

*The user check (which you are referring to wrongly as the visual), to be done before each use. Not recorded or stickered.
*The formal visual inspection (which is what sweetcheeks82 is talking about). Recorded and can be stickered.
*Combined inspection and testing. Recorded and can be stickered.

Formal visual inspections can be carried out inbetween combined inspection & test periods, or even instead of, for some classes of appliance in certain environments. It's all down to the assessment.

 

[Grizzly01]

In my opinion you would conduct a visual inspection before you even consider testing an appliance with a PAT tester .... If you have conducted a visual inspection and you are happy with the appliance, I would then proceed to test it applicably and issue a green pass sticker which would cover both your visual assesment and your electronic tests.

Absolutely. That's why that part of the process is rightly called 'Combined Inspection and Testing'.

But it's not what sweetcheeks82 is asking...

 

[Adam W]

But what you've overlooked it that there are 3 levels to this, not 2:

*The user check (which you are referring to wrongly as the visual), to be done before each use. Not recorded or stickered.
*The formal visual inspection (which is what sweetcheeks82 is talking about). Recorded and can be stickered.
*Combined inspection and testing. Recorded and can be stickered.

Formal visual inspections can be carried out inbetween combined inspection & test periods, or even instead of, for some classes of appliance in certain environments. It's all down to the assessment.

What I'm saying is I don't think there should be two separate tests
Should just be user checks and II&TEE. Doing a separate "visual only" is just busywork.

 

[Deleted member 72666]

In my opinion you would conduct a visual inspection before you even consider testing an appliance with a PAT tester. If there are any visual defects that you are not going to repair, cut the plug off and take the appliance out of use and record your findings.

If you have conducted a visual inspection and you are happy with the appliance, I would then proceed to test it applicably and issue a green pass sticker which would cover both your visual assesment and your electronic tests.

You can purchase visual pass stickers - personally I'd use these for items of equipment that you can't PAT test (laptop chargers, phone charges etc etc)....

^^^ This!

 

[Grizzly01]

What I'm saying is I don't think there should be two separate tests
Should just be user checks and II&TEE. Doing a separate "visual only" is just busywork.

The IET disagree with you.

 

[sweetcheeks82]

Thanks for your replies. maybe i was a bit quick in my question.
I am having to start from scratch as no previous records from electricians.
eg. Class 1 Portable appliance in commercial kitchen.
Visual = pass. Combined I&T = pass = Green pass sticker Combined I&T is yearly
Formal visual is every 6 months. In 6 months time when i do the formal visual (for arguments sake it passes) i will use a Blue pass formal visual sticker but do i remove the Green pass sticker for electrical test?

 

[Adam W]

Leave it there until the next test.

 

[Adam W]

The IET disagree with you.

The code of practice for II&TEE is a code of best practice, not a statutory document. The HSE (the people who prosecute if it all goes wrong) say you don't actually need PAT testing at all.

I know what the IET say, but the reality is businesses just want a sticker as cheaply as possible, maybe without a complete understanding of what they're paying for. It's bad enough as it is with these '50p per item sticker slappers' without encouraging them.

 

[Grizzly01]

The HSE (the people who prosecute if it all goes wrong) say you don't actually need PAT testing at all.

Well no, that really isn't the case at all, is it?
Point us towards where the HSE say that, but if the guidance you quote is just for low-risk environments, I'll call you out on it...

 

[Adam W]

Well no, that really isn't the case at all, is it?
Point us towards where the HSE say that, but if the guidance you quote is just for low-risk environments, I'll call you out on it...

http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/july.pdf

 

[oldtimer]

My understanding it is combined visual and testing but the duty holder who is in charge of PAT testing for the building is supposed to have a system in place to do visual checks on equipment or basically a tick box exercise

 

[Grizzly01]

http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/july.pdf

Nope, that doesn't back up what you stated in the slightest.
Try again.

 

[Adam W]

Nope, that doesn't back up what you stated in the slightest.
Try again.

Well, it does. The whole point of PAT testing is to make sure equipment is 'adequately maintained' in accordance with EAWR, it doesn't say anything about having someone going around putting 2 stickers on everything.

 

[Grizzly01]

No, it doesn't. Re-read the thread if you need reminding of what you wrote (it's not too far up).

Then read this PAT (Portable appliance testing) - HSE's answers to popular questions to see why it doesn't agree with your blanket statement.

 

[Adam W]

OK, it says:

"the Regulations do not specify what needs to be done, by whom or how frequently (ie they don't make inspection or testing of electrical appliances a legal requirement, nor do they make it a legal requirement to undertake this annually)."

And
"Is Portable Appliance Testing (PAT) compulsory?
No."

Seems quite clear to me.