Well I have contacted a building standards officer and sent him the pictures, he will get back to me tomo hopefully and we will find out what he has to say, hopefully he can [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]recommend a decent electrician to fix the cock up as I dont want to go back to these guys again.[/FONT] I will keep you all posted. Thanks for all the input.
 
Its a pity he diidn't fish the cable behind the coving,you would have had less disturbance and just 2 vertical drops to the switches
 
sorry guys, everyone is throwing measurements at this, I don't know whether its to help the sparks that did it or to cheer the OP up.
Really !!! have a look at the photo's and ask yourself would i have made a pigs ear like this seems to be, I would like to think, No.
no matter what way you dress it up it needs correcting, the less people get away with this kind of mess the sooner people will stop trying to pass themselves off a proper tradesmen.
 
Behind the door is against regs, above the door even more so. And how that 2 gang switches cable wasn't hit is beyond me.

So whodunnit?

The OP? A 5 week wonder? A builder? Surely not a proper sparkie???
 
Also given how its clipped, would like to see how that garbage called capping is fitted over it. No way has a spark done that work!
 
Stupid thing is, it's really not far off being compliant!

If the vertical chase behind the door was about 3 inches closer to the corner and the horizontal chase above the door was 3 inches higher, it looks like it would be fine!
 
Also given how its clipped, would like to see how that garbage called capping is fitted over it. No way has a spark done that work!

Any need for capping in this instance? Whoever makes good isn't going to be jabbing their trowel into the chase (I hope!)
 
Any need for capping in this instance? Whoever makes good isn't going to be jabbing their trowel into the chase (I hope!)
I'm no plasterer but I could cover up any track with cable in it without wrecking the cable. Anything from 1MM wide to 100M wide, no bother. Willing to try my hand at wider too. Not exactly the point though is it? That cable needs protection from the plasterer. Capping is garbage, I don't know how anyone can use it and be happy with it.

This is one install that could justify the use of capping, and even skipping the other issues with it even that's not possible due to how cables been clipped. I don't think a spark has done the work. Someone with a bit of DIY/building skills sure, not a spark.
 
sadly folks this was indeed done by a fully qualified sparky... There were 2 of them who came. They were recommended by a local letting agent who sends them to all their properties to do jobs apparently...
 
OK, so you've had 2 idiots for the price of one.
 
Do you know what scheme they are registered with? Elecsa, Napit or NICEIC.

If you do maybe you should send copies of your photo's to the appropriate one for their comments.
 
Also given how it’s clipped, would like to see how that garbage called capping is fitted over it. No way has a spark done that work!

Yes, I thought that too, with the cables so far apart. A bit of galv top-hat capping would have been better then nothing don’t you think? Or even the cheap plastic stuff? Personally I’d have done it with a single 3C&E if the circuit allowed. Or if not, a bit of multi-core SY (Which I think is great.)

Stupid thing is, it's really not far off being compliant!

If the vertical chase behind the door was about 3 inches closer to the corner and the horizontal chase above the door was 3 inches higher, it looks like it would be fine!

Yes, exactly! It’s not a proper job, but it’s not a proper bodge either! It loses on both counts :)

no but we could run a book on the nearest :)
Ha Ha! I’d put a fiver on the centre line of the over-door chase being 280mm from the ceiling (ignoring the cove). Losers PayPal cash to the one winner :) Anyone else in?
 
Last edited:
Well folks I have spoken to my local building officer who says the work is a shambles and does not comply with relevant regulations. I called the electrician and said I wanted the work re-done. He said he would think of a day when he can fix it and call me back which means he will ignore any future calls from me. Will need to get someone else in to fix the mess. What a nightmare
 
it's not a horrendous cost involved. if you post your location, i'm sure one of us will be close to you.
 
sadly folks this was indeed done by a fully qualified sparky... There were 2 of them who came. They were recommended by a local letting agent who sends them to all their properties to do jobs apparently...

This is your strongest angle of attack, if they refuse to answer calls etc and dont rectify their poor workmanship then contact letting agency explain you have building control in and hes expressed his concerns about the lack of compliance and the poor nature of he workmanship, this way hopefully they will drop them and stop others been hoodwinked by these so called cowboys.... safe zones on walls is basic for any electrician qualified or apprentice. Good luck!
 
safe zones on walls is basic for any electrician qualified or apprentice. Good luck!

My thoughts exactly... I'm VERY new to the game but 5 seconds with those photos and I knew the work wasn't right.

Oh, by the way, I believe the work IS compliant, if you don't have the cables plastered in (ie: they remain surface mounted!)

Did you get a minor works certificate?
 
Well folks I have spoken to my local building officer who says the work is a shambles and does not comply with relevant regulations. I called the electrician and said I wanted the work re-done. He said he would think of a day when he can fix it and call me back which means he will ignore any future calls from me. Will need to get someone else in to fix the mess. What a nightmare

are you sure its not your handy diy neighbour who did it really and a spark picked up on it and you are asking for advice as to if it complies?, if it was a spark they must surely be registered under some scheme eg. napit,elecsa,nic especially if they have been recommended by a company who gets them to do work for them.
my point is you do not have to get somebody out and pay them to re do the job if you know what scheme they are registered under you need to contact the scheme and send them the photographs as shown on here and the registered scheme body will do the rest for you, they will send another spark out to redo the job if you dont want the original sparks out and then the registered scheme provider will charge them the original sparks for the work and not you, WHY do you want to pay out twice for somebody elses mistake if they were a proper spark in the first place?, that is why us sparks are registered as it is also a safety net for you the client when things like this happen. it puzzles me that even a half decent sparks apprentice on his first year would have at least of chiselled away enough to fit capping over the t&e.? using my sds drill wouldnt have chased it that well without tlc and time on my hands!
 
The capping thing still confuses me...

Is there really any point to it in a narrow chase? The base coat just gets rammed on top and the trowel goes nowhere near the cables...

(by someone who has far more experience with plaster than electrics by the way!)
 
If the installtion is less than 50mm from any surface it must be either mechanically protected or have additional protection by RCD, looking at the picture that is posted some of the wiring is zoned some is not, zoning is vertical or horizontal the switch and 150mm from the ceiling and the angle of two walls
 
If the installtion is less than 50mm from any surface it must be either mechanically protected or have additional protection by RCD, looking at the picture that is posted some of the wiring is zoned some is not, zoning is vertical or horizontal the switch and 150mm from the ceiling and the angle of two walls
Don't forget about the option to use an earthed sheath, or earthed conduit or trunking.
 
would still require RCD protection if outside of prescribed zones.
 
Do you know what scheme they are registered with? Elecsa, Napit or NICEIC.

If you do maybe you should send copies of your photo's to the appropriate one for their comments.

I'll try this question again for the OP!!
 
would still require RCD protection if outside of prescribed zones.
No RCD protection is only an option, if the cables are in prescribed zones.
All that's been done, is in the 17th, they've added the RCD requirement to the 16th option to run cables in prescribed zones.
 
Hi thanks for all the replies, I being honest about what happened and it wasnt some local DIY fella, I got their details through a letting agent as I had been told in the past that having someone recommended would be better than picking up the yellow pages. The only major electrical work I have had done in the past was on a garage conversion where the builder supplied the electrician who seemed to do a decent job and provided a certificate. I have contacted the letting agent again to get the electricians company address, there are quite a few companies with the same name it seems, and I am going to see what scheme if any they are registered with. It is my fault for not checking what schemes they are registered with in the first place but in all honesty I didnt even know much about these schemes until I spoke to people on this forum. If they are registered with a scheme I will contact them with pictures and see what they say. Thanks for all the advice folks, I will keep you posted on what happens.
 
We're not trying to catch you out and in this case it seems you have come off the wrong side of the regs and very poor workmanship.

I guess you're not going to be recommending these guys to anyone.

If you get feedback from a scheme please update us because we pay fees, insurance, etc to keep the right side of the law and such poor workmanship needs to be high lighted.
 
Don't get me wrong - I'm not justifying non compliant work but this thread is worrying. If we are not careful our ELECTRICIANS FORUM, will be hi-jacked by 'Have A Go DIY'er' and Customers bitching about other electricains work.

We should be mindful when we only get one side of a story.

I've had a recent customer that was very determined I should not install an extraction fan in her new bathroom. I made note of this fact on the Certificate to cover myself. However, the house is soon to be sold and the new owner may think I was a cowboy when he see's no extractor fan in a newly located bathroom. He may even post a comment on this forum!!
 
We should be mindful when we only get one side of a story.

True enough, in the same way as there should be a program on TV called "Rogue Customer" to balance out "Rouge Trader".

That said, in this case a picture speak a thousand words, and that work is terrible. There's no justification for that, if the customer insisted that it was done that way (and I'm not suggesting they did in this case) for a job I was on, I'd insist that they get stuffed.

I can't/won't compete with cowboys on price, so I rely on higher standards. It would be a false economy for me to produce work like that as it would cost me dearly further down the road. The deviation you described when not fitting a fan at the customer's insistance is fair enough, and noted in the appropriate place. To be equivalent to the work shown here you'd have had to fit the fan under the bath blowing into the room.
 
fit fan under bath, yes, but then have it blowing up through a series of holes in the bottom of the bath -instant jacuzzi!
 
Also to clarify as I know this has been mentioned a few times, at no point did I insist that they do not go through the ceiling or floor. In fact when they first came to give me a quote they said part of the ceiling would need to be re-plastered as well as the wall and that I should be aware of this before they started the job. So I was surprised to see the ceiling had not been touched.
 
Agreed - It is not good work, is none compliant and by rights be re-routed into the correct zones.

The more important question surely should be 'Is the cable RCD protected? If so, then where ever it is located under the plaster, it is unlikely to ever become 'a dangerous wiring job'.
 
Quote
It is my fault for not checking what schemes they are registered with in the first place but in all honesty I didnt even know much about these schemes until I spoke to people on this forum.

I have always stated
When you join a scheme,it matters not who you are with and who is the most popular
There we have it,this is typical of the vast majority of the general public.They have heard of none of them or that part p fiasco
icon6.png

Anyone for renewal ?
icon10.png
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Has my electrician done a dangerous wiring job?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
74

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Homervanderjazz,
Last reply from
Des 56,
Replies
74
Views
11,111

Advert

Back
Top