Help! Advice please.

[Chris derrick]

hi all, first post here.

The story in a nut shell is, I did some work for a customer through a building contractor. It was a big house with 2 consumer units. I sorted out the nuisance tripping and added a sub-board for a outhouse. I also did some superficial works. Replacing face plates etc.

This was about 3 months ago. Iv had a phone call recently with a bill £2300 from the building contractor, as the property had earth leakage on the lighting and many unlying issues that wasn't picked up on. I told the building contractor and the customer many times the property needed a full service to put right what was wrong.

Question is how liable am ?

 

[Octopus]

Bank transfers. No Certs issued. City and guilds level 3 Paul. Very unprofessional I know.

So you changed a cu, didn't issue a cert, no part p probably.

Stupidity IMHO

Are you mad?

 

[snowhead]

No paper trail. Suppose I should pay up....

NO.

If it went to a Court case, the builder would have to prove either;

You didn't complete what you were paid for and the £2300 is a refund they are asking for.

OR, the work you did was not satisfactory and they have paid someone else to correct it, BUT they would have to explain why they didn't give you the opportunity to either inspect the alledged faulty work or even correct it.

OR the work you did has caused damage to the property or installation to the value of £2300.

If you intend just to pay it without arguement, then it would appear you also owe me £3200, can you pay up please.

 

[Chris derrick]

Just instructed to carry out the work. I was naive to think to the building contractor would sort out the rest. Il be honest guys, I wanted the experience under my belt. just panicking there to me to court and throw the book at me

 

[telectrix]

No paper trail. Suppose I should pay up....

don't be stupid. tell them to sod off.

 

[Chris derrick]

Agreed murdoch.

 

[Chris derrick]

Cheers guys appreciate the reassurance, really do. Question is if does go to court would building control get involved?

 

[ruston]

Having no paper trail may actually help you here , the burden of proof is with them and with nothing in writing it is not a strong case . Is any official bodies involved , ie BC, H&S ?
If you are unregistered too, and they knew it and condoned it they are complicit.

 

[Chris derrick]

no BS or HS as far as I know Ruston. The only proof they may have is invoices.

 

[Des 56]

If they have issue with the work you carried out,they should at least have presentable evidence such as an eicr from another source that points the finger at your own work standard

The Part P notification procedure is the householders problem
It is the duty of the householder to make sure the work he commissions complies with the building regs

You should have no direct contact with the householder,your contract was with the builder

 

[ruston]

You are correct Des , that is what I was getting at If the builder has informed the householder that the spark is registered and he is not , it is the builder that is then being decietful.

 

[Paul228]

My advice is bluff it out using the info the guys say.
Learn from this
And don't do it again you daft sod

 

[Chris derrick]

Thanks for the advice guys.... writing all this down. Feeling I have more of a case listening to what your all saying.

 

[ruston]

And take Pauls post in , learn from this . It could be much much worse.

 

[Des 56]

The question I would like to ask but he may not want to answer

The £ 2300,what does this figure cover and how large is it in comparison to the payment you received

 

[Chris derrick]

Truly noted guys. Iv been an absolute t**t. Il keep you updated. Much appreciated!!!