The exact technical data according to the manual, Voltage 220-240V 50Hz, Total Electric Consumption 2.3kW, Fuse Protection min. 13A, Cable Type/cross Section H05VV-FG 3 x 1.5 mm2 or equivalent, Cable Length 2m. Also states to a double pole control unit with a minimum contact clearance of 3mm in all poles and further stated that Additional protection by a residual current circuit breaker is recommended.
When the manufacturers manual states 1.5mm2 cable, does that mean 1.5mm2 from the consumer unit as most existing cooker circuits are surely going to be wired in 6mm2 (as mine is) or 10mm2. This is specifying the cable from the fixed wiring to the cooker, the one specified is a 3 core flex. Run from the CU would cause problems with the 2m limit, they are trying to ensure that the cable will not over heat.
Should it be wired on the rcd protected side of the consumer? Since the manufacturers recommend it then it should be RCD protected, there may be other requirements in the wiring regulations that mean an RCD must be present, but this would get beyond a simple cooker replacement and start to involve the requirements of the Building regulations, testing and certification of the work and notifying building control as well.
Anyway i couldn't get the 6mm2 in the cooker terminals so i rewired from the cooker switch in 2.5mm2, so the current circuit is 32a breaker (not on the rcd protected side), 6mm2 T+E to double pole cooker switch (not plug socket type) then 2.5mm2 from cooker switch to cooker terminals.
Could someone clarify if my current circuit is ok and if not what would be the ideal circuit given the specifications i have given. An ideal circuit would be a 2.5mm2 twin and earth cable run direct from a 16A RCBO in the CU to a double pole switch (whether fused at 13A or not) and from the double pole switch to the cooker in HO5VV-F flex at either 1.5mm or 2.5mm.