H
hotXbun
I'm working in a small housing estate circa 1960 (ish). All the houses are wired with no earth to the lighting circuits. Many of the houses have metal light fittings. Many have boarded lofts. Many have CU's not up to date. .... ok ..... so:
Any electrical work is being carried out as part of some other improvement. In this case, I'm putting in a new bathroom. Up in the part boarded loft, the existing 6mm T&E supply has been fed to a junction box and out comes 2- 2.5 T&E ( one to whirlpool bath, other to double SSO in bedroom ) and the 6mm T&E then continues on to the second bathroom shower... I might add that the second bathroom shower has been fitted by son and the pull cord operating that shower had lost it's pull cord and customer has asked me to replace the cord (which I have done) so she can use second bathroom .... the existing lighting is to 3 dodgy downlights in the bathroom (I'm working on) - one is directly above the shower head - I would judge no more than 200mm away! Together with the downlights, there are 3 !! pull cord switches - one redundant, one to centre light and other controlling 2 more lights. Cables wired between various fittings is 1.0mm T&E with earth wire charmingly cut back and all connections via fully exposed bits of terminal strip .... am beginning to feel it looks like one of my old jobs .... actually, this almost certainly what I uncover in virtually all my jobs for many a year
So, assuming you still reading this, would you agree with my reasoning:
Stewart
Any electrical work is being carried out as part of some other improvement. In this case, I'm putting in a new bathroom. Up in the part boarded loft, the existing 6mm T&E supply has been fed to a junction box and out comes 2- 2.5 T&E ( one to whirlpool bath, other to double SSO in bedroom ) and the 6mm T&E then continues on to the second bathroom shower... I might add that the second bathroom shower has been fitted by son and the pull cord operating that shower had lost it's pull cord and customer has asked me to replace the cord (which I have done) so she can use second bathroom .... the existing lighting is to 3 dodgy downlights in the bathroom (I'm working on) - one is directly above the shower head - I would judge no more than 200mm away! Together with the downlights, there are 3 !! pull cord switches - one redundant, one to centre light and other controlling 2 more lights. Cables wired between various fittings is 1.0mm T&E with earth wire charmingly cut back and all connections via fully exposed bits of terminal strip .... am beginning to feel it looks like one of my old jobs .... actually, this almost certainly what I uncover in virtually all my jobs for many a year
So, assuming you still reading this, would you agree with my reasoning:
- I can advise customer on state of work required and ask if she would like an estimate for work necessary to bring standard up to 17th Edition. She doesn't have to accept.
- I can leave as is and all is well, but.... I am involved ....
- So, obviously I can put in new lights and wire up lights and presumably I could grab an earth from a locally placed socket outlet in the loft?
- Presumably I cover my backside by noting deviations from regs on test certificate but where does this leave customer should she decide to leave as is?
- Lastly, if I re-cord the pull cord to the pull cord switch controlling the shower, do I have to then test it out?
Stewart