H
HellDiverUK
Hi folks.
Just wondering if I can get an opinion about the system I had fitted in September 2013.
System as follows:
SunnyBoy
Tigo optimisers on panels, and Tigo "box" that links to the internet
20x ET Solar
Install is as follows:
8x panel on front of house (NE facing)
12x panel on back of house (SW facing)
Charged: £10,300.
So, yeah, you've probably noticed the first issue - NE facing roof. Yep, that was the first hoodwink. Yes, they'll produce fine they said. They'll catch the morning sun they said. Turns out they're as pointless as you expect - unfortunately we didn't do our research and signed the dotted line. The front panels will never pay back over 20 years. As it is, the back panels are performing well, shame they're having to carry the fronts.
The Tigo stuff, well that's a farce.
There's a box in the attic beside the inverter that connects to the internet and transmits data to Tigo's web site. Except the data on the Tigo site doesn't correlate with what the inverter and the generation meter say. The generation and Sunnyboy agree. As of today, the Sunnyboy is reporting 892kW generated, Tigo is saying 947kW. I'm not convinced whatever the Tigo stuff is doing makes it worth the £1000 charged for it.
There were small Tigo boxes on the panels, I assume those are micro inverters? Maybe someone could explain what they do?
The install quality was terrible, too - they fitted the mains isolator overlapping the electric meter, so when the electricity company arrived to change the meter for an import/export meter, he was going to walk off site as he couldn't get the old meter removed. I shifted the box myself while the OH made the guy a cup of tea.
So, after that disaster, we did a LOT of research, and we know we were conned.
On the other hand, another company fitted a 6.5kW system to the OH's parent's house, also with a SB5000TL-21, and 26x Renesola panels, Immersun, and had change from £9k, and they did a WAY better install job. It's a ESE facing roof, and it's performing excellently.
Just wondering if I can get an opinion about the system I had fitted in September 2013.
System as follows:
SunnyBoy
SMA SB5000TL-21
fitted in atticTigo optimisers on panels, and Tigo "box" that links to the internet
20x ET Solar
ET-P660250
panels Install is as follows:
8x panel on front of house (NE facing)
12x panel on back of house (SW facing)
Charged: £10,300.
So, yeah, you've probably noticed the first issue - NE facing roof. Yep, that was the first hoodwink. Yes, they'll produce fine they said. They'll catch the morning sun they said. Turns out they're as pointless as you expect - unfortunately we didn't do our research and signed the dotted line. The front panels will never pay back over 20 years. As it is, the back panels are performing well, shame they're having to carry the fronts.
The Tigo stuff, well that's a farce.
There's a box in the attic beside the inverter that connects to the internet and transmits data to Tigo's web site. Except the data on the Tigo site doesn't correlate with what the inverter and the generation meter say. The generation and Sunnyboy agree. As of today, the Sunnyboy is reporting 892kW generated, Tigo is saying 947kW. I'm not convinced whatever the Tigo stuff is doing makes it worth the £1000 charged for it.
There were small Tigo boxes on the panels, I assume those are micro inverters? Maybe someone could explain what they do?
The install quality was terrible, too - they fitted the mains isolator overlapping the electric meter, so when the electricity company arrived to change the meter for an import/export meter, he was going to walk off site as he couldn't get the old meter removed. I shifted the box myself while the OH made the guy a cup of tea.
So, after that disaster, we did a LOT of research, and we know we were conned.
On the other hand, another company fitted a 6.5kW system to the OH's parent's house, also with a SB5000TL-21, and 26x Renesola panels, Immersun, and had change from £9k, and they did a WAY better install job. It's a ESE facing roof, and it's performing excellently.