Because you can't see it, so N/V.
The book is a Guide, very help full if you don't understand how thing work.Really .not just another dollar in there bank account
Because you can't see it, so N/V.
The book is a Guide, very help full if you don't understand how thing work.Really .not just another dollar in there bank account
Although I agree, an OCPD should not be rated higher than the conductor size, it may not warrant a C2.Regardless of whether you can gain access to certain parts of the circuit is irrelevant, if the ocpd is rated more than the conductor size then its a c2 .either one is an unsatisfactory report , as in further investigation .a locked room could be a commercial kitchen pantry .lots of current flowing thru 2 legs of a radial 2.5 mm circuit protected by say a c32amp mcb
There are still checks and balances at play. The calculation for cable size where overload protection is not required is based on Ib (design current) and would be considered accordingly. In these circumstances the cable rating [as installed] must exceed the load yet may not neccessarily exceed the rating of the overcurrent device. It could therefore be higher and 'should not' is not relevant. This would need to be determined as part of the calculations associated with the inspection should there be reason for concern.Although I agree, an OCPD should not be rated higher than the conductor size
In your given example of a 1.5mm spur off a ring circuit. This is not ok unless via a fused spur as overload is indeed possible.