A typical MAXIMUM value is not the same thing as a typical value.Are you guys seriously saying you don’t know the typical Ze values for TN-S and TN-C-S?
A TN-S reading can be extremely low if near the transformer.
A typical MAXIMUM value is not the same thing as a typical value.Are you guys seriously saying you don’t know the typical Ze values for TN-S and TN-C-S?
And?A typical MAXIMUM value is not the same thing as a typical value.
A TN-S reading can be extremely low if near the transformer.
A typical MAXIMUM value is not the same thing as a typical value.Are you guys seriously saying you don’t know the typical Ze values for TN-S and TN-C-S?
And it disproves your earlier remarks?And?
Disproves nothing.A typical MAXIMUM value is not the same thing as a typical value.
And it disproves your earlier remarks?
They are typical maximum values as the DNOs are not compelled to remain within those values.Disproves nothing.
It’s a statement which has no value.
There are no typical maximum values.
There is either a maximum or a typical value.
No the maximum value would be infinity.They are typical maximum values as the DNOs are not compelled to remain within those values.
You guess a lot of earthing systems![]()
Seriously?I’ve measured various values for ze for both tns and tncs, in a career as an electrician that has upto now lasted 19 years, what I can conclude is that there is NO typical value at all.
I’ve measured 0.10 ohms for tncs, measured 0.15 ohms for tns, I’ve also measured 0.30 ohms for tns, and countless other values.
PME conditions can apply to TN-S.If I had to take a guess I would guess a 0.21 reading is more likely to be a TN-S than a PME.
I was thinking to compare this Ze with line to neutral impedance.Post 3 wilko....0.21