Where did you get those cable sizes from? sorry you are quoting US cablesHow would I go about calculating it for any given circuit?
Lets say I had a 60 amp feeder, 13.30mm2 phase and 5.261mm2 earth. How long could I run the circuit before the 90*C insulation on the earth wire overheats for a fault? At what point would I need to up size my earth wire?
How would I go about calculating it for any given circuit?
Lets say I had a 60 amp feeder, 13.30mm2 phase and 5.261mm2 earth. How long could I run the circuit before the 90*C insulation on the earth wire overheats for a fault? At what point would I need to up size my earth wire?
You need to know the characteristics of the OCPD in some detail, and also to have in mind a starting temperature (is it 30C ambient, or 70C operating, etc).
We don't normally calculate cable size that way.
We start with the details of the circuit, design current, length etc and then calculate what size cable is required from that.
We don't pick a cable size and then work out how long we can make the circuit.
As you know adiabatic equations relate to heat loss and in the case of a cable the idea is to work out when it will melt/vapourise or take the fault current envisaged. So the first item you need is the fault current which we work out by U/Zs=I from there we can use the adiabatic equation to assay the required S(ize)
View attachment 60498
The t/time value and K value are read from tables.
Yes, the adiabatic assumption is no significant heat is lost. So for trip times under 10-ish seconds that is a fair assumption.Two things here- my understanding is that heat loss can be ignored. 1) The wire is treated as a "closed cylinder" in that heat applied via I2R will not radiate into space during the short circuit. 2) Our limitation is the final temperature of the copper, not the at what point the metal will anneal or begin to melt. An EGC should in theory survive multiple short circuits through the in service life of the system.
I'm assuming T is time, but where or how do I obtain "k"?
Looks like a typical simple MCCB or similar. That graph is normalised so you would need to compute points for the constant I2t in units of the 1 = 60A or whatever and see where it intercepts it.
With MCB/MCCB if you get down in to the "instantaneous" region you can't really use the time very well - in fact often it is not really specified as such - so you need to get a plot of let-through energy instead.
[automerge]1598818008[/automerge]
Yes, the adiabatic assumption is no significant heat is lost. So for trip times under 10-ish seconds that is a fair assumption.
Temperature limit is usually that of the insulation as much lower than the conductor limit, but depends on specific class of cable type, etc.
There are various physics models for this, but normally you just look at the tables in various wiring regulations for values of 'k' to use.
k depends on the material (copper, etc) and the temperature rise that is acceptable (more or less, R varies a bit with t etc).What do I do if my regs do not have a "K" value? This is my big hold back.
Starting temp is what you design for normal operation.Why do you use the starting temp and not the final temp for the R1+R2 values? And why 160*C?
Reply to the thread, titled "Need Help Learning to Compute Adiabatic Method" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.