There is talk of them doing away with "RCD's on everything" etc.
Not sure how reliable that is tho.
there is no requirment at the moment for RCD's to be on EVERYTHING
at least 4 examples I can think of
cables clipped directly to surface
saftey circuit ie fire alarm
designated final circuit with a specificaly labelled outlet advising non rcd protected (circuit for fridge etc)
if the premesis is ocupied by electricaly trained personell ie you as the qualified spark in YOUR house
technically in any electricians house no circuit is required to be on an rcd as you are trained.
I do feel its a protection racket tho
by following 7671 you are exceeding the electricity at work regs which is the statutory document they would use to prosecute if anything went wrong.
now the 16th edition exceeded the EAWR so can anyone tell me there was anything UNSAFE about the 16th edition? parts of it were more safe you could argue with the omission of crossbonding in the 17th
GOD knows what petty sentence they will alter or colour they will change the book to just to squeeze another 150 quid out of you plus the 70 quid the book costs
if people wired to the 16th edition now you are by far exceeding the EAWR and could not be prosecuted
I had this argument with many tutors of courses and noone has a definative answer
they all seem to say well thats just the way it is with a shrug!!!!!!!!!
we are cucified in this country for trying to make money
i should have done plastering - van - trowel - plaster - job done