J
johnelectrical
SSE are you saying there is a main protective bonding conductor going from the MET to a clamp on the gas pipe next to the meter and then another bonding conductor going from a point 6M along the gas pipe to the incoming water pipe?
If so there are two issues; 1, the fact that the main bonding conductor is not continuous so that the removal of one bond to an extraneous conductive part (gas) could cause another connection to an extraneous conductive part (water) to be open/disconnected 528.3.3 There is no regulation in BS7671 that specifically requires the bonding conductor to be void of any permanent joints, ie soldered, brazed or crimped joints deemed to be permanent. So the guy who said crimping the two bonding conductors at the midpoint of the main bonding conductor sounds OK to me.
Point 2 is only if the two BS951 bonding clamps are 6M apart on the gas pipe. 543.2.1 a gas pipe shall not be selected as a protective (bonding) conductor
If so there are two issues; 1, the fact that the main bonding conductor is not continuous so that the removal of one bond to an extraneous conductive part (gas) could cause another connection to an extraneous conductive part (water) to be open/disconnected 528.3.3 There is no regulation in BS7671 that specifically requires the bonding conductor to be void of any permanent joints, ie soldered, brazed or crimped joints deemed to be permanent. So the guy who said crimping the two bonding conductors at the midpoint of the main bonding conductor sounds OK to me.
Point 2 is only if the two BS951 bonding clamps are 6M apart on the gas pipe. 543.2.1 a gas pipe shall not be selected as a protective (bonding) conductor